Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 129

1.

After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live.

Knoepffler NJ, O'Malley MJ.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e11-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101031.

PMID:
23637454
2.

Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle.

Rocchi B.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e6-e10. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100735.

PMID:
23637458
3.

Some comments on the paper 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'.

Kuhse H.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):323-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101164c. No abstract available.

PMID:
23637442
4.

Abortion, infanticide and moral context.

Porter L.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):350-2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100661.

PMID:
23637451
5.

Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva.

Manninen BA.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):330-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100656.

PMID:
23637447
6.

Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals.

Finnis J.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):281-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101198.

PMID:
23637427
7.

After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?

Giubilini A, Minerva F.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):261-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100411. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

PMID:
22361296
8.

The moral status of babies.

McGee A.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):345-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100629.

PMID:
23637450
9.

Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.

Beard M, Lynch S.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e1-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100692.

PMID:
23637453
10.

Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.

Wrigley A.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e15-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100958.

PMID:
23637455
11.

Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'.

Rini RA.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):353-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100640.

PMID:
23637452
12.

Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.

Beckwith FJ.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):341-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100844.

PMID:
23637449
13.

Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion.

Biegler P.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):323. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101164b. No abstract available.

PMID:
23637441
14.

'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential.

Oakley J.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):324-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101164e. No abstract available.

PMID:
23637444
15.

The moral significance of being born.

Levy N.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):326-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100734.

PMID:
23637446
16.

Infanticide and madness.

George RP.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):299-301. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101203. No abstract available.

PMID:
23637432
17.

Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on.

Savulescu J.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):257-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101404. No abstract available.

PMID:
23637422
18.

Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.

Laing JA.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):336-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100664.

19.

Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva.

Camosy C.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):296-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100617.

PMID:
23637431
20.

Is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?

Camosy C.

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):301-2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100814. No abstract available.

PMID:
23637433
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk