Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 181

1.

Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.

Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Macaskill P.

Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

PMID:
23623721
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Incremental effect from integrating 3D-mammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: Increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trial.

Caumo F, Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Houssami N.

Breast. 2014 Feb;23(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

PMID:
24316152
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.

Houssami N, Macaskill P, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Ciatto S.

Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jul;50(10):1799-807. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

PMID:
24746887
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

Effect of integrating 3D-mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trial.

Bernardi D, Caumo F, Macaskill P, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Houssami N.

Eur J Cancer. 2014 May;50(7):1232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

PMID:
24582915
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.

Nederend J, Duijm LE, Voogd AC, Groenewoud JH, Jansen FH, Louwman MW.

Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 9;14(1):R10.

PMID:
22230363
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration.

Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, Izadi M, Jebsen IN, Jahr G, Krager M, Hofvind S.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2061-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2820-3. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

PMID:
23553585
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
7.

Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.

van Luijt PA, Fracheboud J, Heijnsdijk EA, den Heeten GJ, de Koning HJ; National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening in Netherlands Study Group (NETB).

Eur J Cancer. 2013 Nov;49(16):3517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

PMID:
23871248
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Integrated 2D and 3D mammography.

Sumkin JH.

Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):e292-3. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70223-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
23816295
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.

Weigel S, Batzler WU, Decker T, Hense HW, Heindel W.

Rofo. 2009 Dec;181(12):1144-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109831. Epub 2009 Oct 26.

PMID:
19859859
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, Izadi M, Jebsen IN, Jahr G, Krager M, Niklason LT, Hofvind S, Gur D.

Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):47-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121373. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

PMID:
23297332
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time.

Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, Anesi V, Burlon S, Cauli E, Depaoli M, Larentis L, Malesani V, Targa L, Baldo P, Houssami N.

Br J Radiol. 2012 Dec;85(1020):e1174-8. doi: 10.1259/bjr/19385909.

PMID:
23175484
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.

Tunçbilek I, Ozdemir A, Gültekin S, Oğur T, Erman R, Yüce C.

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007 Dec;13(4):183-7.

PMID:
18092288
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
13.

Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection.

Houssami N, Skaane P.

Breast. 2013 Apr;22(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.017. Epub 2013 Feb 16. Review.

PMID:
23422255
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.

Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, Durand MA, Plecha DM, Greenberg JS, Hayes MK, Copit DS, Carlson KL, Cink TM, Barke LD, Greer LN, Miller DP, Conant EF.

JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2499-507. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6095.

PMID:
25058084
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.

Skaane P, Skjennald A, Young K, Egge E, Jebsen I, Sager EM, Scheel B, Søvik E, Ertzaas AK, Hofvind S, Abdelnoor M.

Acta Radiol. 2005 Nov;46(7):679-89.

PMID:
16372686
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.

Fenton JJ, Xing G, Elmore JG, Bang H, Chen SL, Lindfors KK, Baldwin LM.

Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):580-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00002.

PMID:
23588746
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
17.

Early detection of breast cancer through population-based mammographic screening in Asian women: a comparison study between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.

Chuwa EW, Yeo AW, Koong HN, Wong CY, Yong WS, Tan PH, Ho JT, Wong JS, Ho GH.

Breast J. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):133-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00687.x.

PMID:
19292798
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography: a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.

Lynge E, Ponti A, James T, Májek O, von Euler-Chelpin M, Anttila A, Fitzpatrick P, Frigerio A, Kawai M, Scharpantgen A, Broeders M, Hofvind S, Vidal C, Ederra M, Salas D, Bulliard JL, Tomatis M, Kerlikowske K, Taplin S; ICSN DCIS Working group.

Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan;50(1):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

PMID:
24041876
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.

Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):377-84.

PMID:
17242245
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.

Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Aug 1;99(15):1162-70. Epub 2007 Jul 24.

PMID:
17652282
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk