Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 110

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23619796)

1.

Humans and ecosystems over the coming millennia: overview of a biosphere assessment of radioactive waste disposal in Sweden.

Kautsky U, Lindborg T, Valentin J.

Ambio. 2013 May;42(4):383-92. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0405-7. Review.

2.

A strategy for describing the biosphere at candidate sites for repositories of nuclear waste: linking ecosystem and landscape modeling.

Lindborg T, Lindborg R, Löfgren A, Söderbäck B, Bradshaw C, Kautsky U.

Ambio. 2006 Dec;35(8):418-24.

PMID:
17334049
3.

A biosphere assessment of high-level radioactive waste disposal in Sweden.

Kautsky U, Lindborg T, Valentin J.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Apr;164(1-2):103-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu336. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

PMID:
25431486
4.

Marine ecosystem modeling beyond the box: using GIS to study carbon fluxes in a coastal ecosystem.

Wijnbladh E, Jönsson BF, Kumblad L.

Ambio. 2006 Dec;35(8):484-95.

PMID:
17334056
5.

Pools and fluxes of organic matter in a boreal landscape: implications for a safety assessment of a repository for nuclear waste.

Kumblad L, Söderbäck B, Löfgren A, Lindborg T, Wijnbladh E, Kautsky U.

Ambio. 2006 Dec;35(8):496-504.

PMID:
17334057
6.

Climate considerations in long-term safety assessments for nuclear waste repositories.

Näslund JO, Brandefelt J, Liljedahl LC.

Ambio. 2013 May;42(4):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0406-6.

8.

From site data to safety assessment: analysis of present and future hydrological conditions at a coastal site in Sweden.

Berglund S, Bosson E, Sassner M.

Ambio. 2013 May;42(4):425-34. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0394-6.

9.
10.

Spanish methodological approach for biosphere assessment of radioactive waste disposal.

Agüero A, Pinedo P, Cancio D, Simón I, Moraleda M, Pérez-Sánchez D, Trueba C.

Sci Total Environ. 2007 Oct 1;384(1-3):36-47. Epub 2007 Jun 27. Review.

PMID:
17588645
11.

Radiation induced spent nuclear fuel dissolution under deep repository conditions.

Jonsson M, Nielsen F, Roth O, Ekeroth E, Nilsson S, Hossain MM.

Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Oct 15;41(20):7087-93.

PMID:
17993152
12.
13.

Application of the Spanish methodological approach for biosphere assessment to a generic high-level waste disposal site.

Agüero A, Pinedo P, Simón I, Cancio D, Moraleda M, Trueba C, Pérez-Sánchez D.

Sci Total Environ. 2008 Sep 15;403(1-3):34-58. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.054. Epub 2008 Jul 9.

PMID:
18614203
14.

The scientific base for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel.

Persson L.

Health Phys. 1993 Apr;64(4):417-9.

PMID:
8449725
15.

"Reference Biospheres" for solid radioactive waste disposal: the BIOMASS methodology.

Crossland IG, Pinedo P, Kessler JH, Torres-Vidal C, Walters B.

J Environ Radioact. 2005;84(2):135-49. Epub 2005 Jun 15.

PMID:
15963607
16.
17.

The saturated zone at Yucca Mountain: an overview of the characterization and assessment of the saturated zone as a barrier to potential radionuclide migration.

Eddebbarh AA, Zyvoloski GA, Robinson BA, Kwicklis EM, Reimus PW, Arnold BW, Corbet T, Kuzio SP, Faunt C.

J Contam Hydrol. 2003 Apr-May;62-63:477-93.

PMID:
12714306
18.

Radiological risk assessment and biosphere modelling for radioactive waste disposal in Switzerland.

Brennwald MS, van Dorp F.

J Environ Radioact. 2009 Dec;100(12):1058-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.05.006. Epub 2009 Jun 27.

PMID:
19560845
19.
20.

Radioactive waste management and environmental contamination issues at the Chernobyl site.

Napier BA, Schmieman EA, Voitsekovitch O.

Health Phys. 2007 Nov;93(5):441-51. Review.

PMID:
18049220
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk