Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 195

1.

Magnetic positioning system in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention: a feasibility and safety study.

Weisz G, Smilowitz NR, Moses JW, Rabbani LE, Collins MB, Herscovici A, Jeron A, Leon MB, Luchner A.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec 1;82(7):1084-90. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24946. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

PMID:
23592312
2.

First-in-man (FIM) experience with the Magnetic Medical Positioning System (MPS) for intracoronary navigation.

Jeron A, Fredersdorf S, Debl K, Oren E, Izmirli A, Peleg A, Nekovar A, Herscovici A, Riegger GA, Luchner A.

EuroIntervention. 2009 Nov;5(5):552-7.

PMID:
20142175
3.

Multimodality 3D-roadmap for cardiovascular interventions in congenital heart disease--a single-center, retrospective analysis of 78 cases.

Glöckler M, Halbfaβ J, Koch A, Achenbach S, Dittrich S.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):436-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24646. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

PMID:
22936634
4.

Initial experience in ablation of typical atrial flutter using a novel three-dimensional catheter tracking system.

Sommer P, Wojdyla-Hordynska A, Rolf S, Gaspar T, Eitel C, Arya A, Hindricks G, Piorkowski C.

Europace. 2013 Apr;15(4):578-81. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus226. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

5.

Integration of dual source computed tomography with magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study.

Li C, Tang L, Yang Z, Cao K.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Dec 1;78(7):1108-15. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23114.

PMID:
21538793
6.

A randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ramcharitar S, van Geuns RJ, Patterson M, van der Giessen WJ, van der Ent M, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Nov 15;72(6):761-70. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21674.

PMID:
18798236
7.
8.

The feasibility and safety of applying the Magnetic Navigation System to manage chronically occluded vessels: a single centre experience.

Ramcharitar S, van der Giessen WJ, van der Ent M, de Feyter P, Serruys PW, van Geuns RJ.

EuroIntervention. 2011 Jan;6(6):711-6. doi: 10.4244/A120.

9.

Three-dimensional electromagnetic navigation vs. fluoroscopy for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective feasibility study in patients.

Manstad-Hulaas F, Tangen GA, Dahl T, Hernes TA, Aadahl P.

J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Feb;19(1):70-8. doi: 10.1583/11-3557.1.

PMID:
22313205
10.

Computed tomography as a tool for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions.

Magro M, Schultz C, Simsek C, Garcia-Garcia HM, Regar E, Nieman K, Mollet N, Serruys PW, van Geuns RJ.

EuroIntervention. 2010 May;6 Suppl G:G123-31. doi: 10.4244/. Review.

PMID:
20542818
11.

Magnetically navigated percutaneous coronary intervention in distal and/or complex lesions may improve procedural outcome and material consumption.

IJsselmuiden AJ, Patterson MS, van Nooijen FC, Tangelder GJ, Dirksen MT, Amoroso G, Slagboom T, Serruys PW, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F.

EuroIntervention. 2009 Jan;4(4):517-23.

PMID:
19284075
12.

Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: evaluation in stented vessel segments.

Gradaus R, Mathies K, Breithardt G, Böcker D.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Jul;68(1):44-9.

PMID:
16770813
13.

Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.

Weisz G, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Delgado JA, Marshall JJ, Vetrovec GW, Reisman M, Waksman R, Granada JF, Novack V, Moses JW, Carrozza JP.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 16;61(15):1596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045.

14.

Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.

Spoon DB, Rubinshtein R, Psaltis PJ, Sandhu GS, Lennon R, Rihal CS, Lerman A.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun 1;81(7):1156-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24733. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

PMID:
23436576
15.

Determinants of fluoroscopy time for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the NCDR(®).

Fazel R, Curtis J, Wang Y, Einstein AJ, Smith-Bindman R, Tsai TT, Chen J, Shah ND, Krumholz HM, Nallamothu BK.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec 1;82(7):1091-105. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24996. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

PMID:
23703793
16.

Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views.

Green NE, Chen SY, Hansgen AR, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Carroll JD.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Apr;64(4):451-9.

PMID:
15744720
17.

Integration of MDCT and fluoroscopy using C-arm computed tomography to guide structural cardiac interventions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Krishnaswamy A, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan 1;85(1):139-47. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25392. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

PMID:
24403085
18.

Segmentation and registration of three-dimensional rotational angiogram on live fluoroscopy to guide atrial fibrillation ablation: a new online imaging tool.

Li JH, Haim M, Movassaghi B, Mendel JB, Chaudhry GM, Haffajee CI, Orlov MV.

Heart Rhythm. 2009 Feb;6(2):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.10.038. Epub 2008 Oct 28.

PMID:
19187917
19.

Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion.

Tacher V, Lin M, Desgranges P, Deux JF, Grünhagen T, Becquemin JP, Luciani A, Rahmouni A, Kobeiter H.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Nov;24(11):1698-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.07.016. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

20.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: novel 3-dimensional imaging and quantitative analysis.

Dvir D, Assali A, Kornowski R.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 May 1;71(6):784-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21530.

PMID:
18415954
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk