Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 122

1.

Apparent diffusion coefficient value reflects invasive and proliferative potential of bladder cancer.

Kobayashi S, Koga F, Kajino K, Yoshita S, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Saito K, Masuda H, Fujii Y, Yamada T, Kihara K.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jan;39(1):172-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24148. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

PMID:
23589321
2.

Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Yoshida S, Koga F, Kobayashi S, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Tanaka H, Komai Y, Saito K, Masuda H, Fujii Y, Kawakami S, Kihara K.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):e21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.065. Epub 2012 Mar 11.

PMID:
22414281
3.

Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer: potential utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a biomarker to predict clinical aggressiveness.

Kobayashi S, Koga F, Yoshida S, Masuda H, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Komai Y, Yokoyama M, Saito K, Fujii Y, Kawakami S, Kihara K.

Eur Radiol. 2011 Oct;21(10):2178-86. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2174-7. Epub 2011 Jun 18.

PMID:
21688007
4.

Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurements obtained by 3-Tesla MRI are correlated with biomarkers of bladder cancer proliferative activity.

Sevcenco S, Haitel A, Ponhold L, Susani M, Fajkovic H, Shariat SF, Hiess M, Spick C, Szarvas T, Baltzer PA.

PLoS One. 2014 Sep 9;9(9):e106866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106866. eCollection 2014.

5.

Apparent diffusion coefficient as a prognostic biomarker of upper urinary tract cancer: a preliminary report.

Yoshida S, Kobayashi S, Koga F, Ishioka J, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Nakanishi Y, Matsuoka Y, Numao N, Saito K, Masuda H, Fujii Y, Kihara K.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2206-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2805-2. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

PMID:
23494496
6.

Prospective evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI of the bladder as a biomarker for prediction of bladder cancer aggressiveness.

Sevcenco S, Ponhold L, Heinz-Peer G, Fajkovic H, Haitel A, Susani M, Shariat SF, Szarvas T, Baltzer PA.

Urol Oncol. 2014 Nov;32(8):1166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

PMID:
24962659
7.

Apparent diffusion coefficient value as a biomarker reflecting morphological and biological features of prostate cancer.

Bae H, Yoshida S, Matsuoka Y, Nakajima H, Ito E, Tanaka H, Oya M, Nakayama T, Takeshita H, Kijima T, Ishioka J, Numao N, Koga F, Saito K, Akashi T, Fujii Y, Kihara K.

Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Mar;46(3):555-61.

PMID:
24022845
8.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer on 3T MR: Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient values and Ki-67 expression.

Zhang J, Jing H, Han X, Huang Z, Cao Z, Liu Q.

Acad Radiol. 2013 Dec;20(12):1535-41. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.09.007.

PMID:
24200480
9.

Luminal-type breast cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients with the Ki-67 labeling index.

Mori N, Ota H, Mugikura S, Takasawa C, Ishida T, Watanabe G, Tada H, Watanabe M, Takase K, Takahashi S.

Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):66-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140283. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

PMID:
25203132
10.

Evaluation of risk of muscle invasion, perivesical and/or lymph node affectation by diffusion-weighted magnetic nuclear resonance in the patient who is a candidate for radical cystectomy.

Lista F, Andrés G, Cáceres F, Ramón de Fata F, Rodríguez-Barbero JM, Angulo JC.

Actas Urol Esp. 2013 Jul-Aug;37(7):419-24. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Jun 15. English, Spanish.

PMID:
23773823
11.

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.

Suo ST, Chen XX, Fan Y, Wu LM, Yao QY, Cao MQ, Liu Q, Xu JR.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Aug;21(8):1027-34. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 May 13.

PMID:
24833566
12.

Contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0T to assess aggressiveness of bladder cancer.

Zhou G, Chen X, Zhang J, Zhu J, Zong G, Wang Z.

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Nov;83(11):2013-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

PMID:
25213829
13.

[Application of apparent diffusion coefficient ratio in the diagnosis of bladder cancer grading pre-operation].

Zhou GX, Wang YB, Hao NX, Wu YW, Zhu JQ, Wang B, Wang ZQ, Tao XF.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Oct 8;93(37):2953-6. Chinese.

PMID:
24401582
14.

[Associations of apparent diffusion coefficient value from MR diffusion-weighted imaging with Ki-67 expression and differentiation grade in gastric cancer].

Lu Z, Yao H, Zhou X, Cao Y, Ji L, Qian W, Gu D, Hu C.

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Feb;19(2):204-8. Chinese.

PMID:
26831887
15.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) value: a potential imaging biomarker that reflects the biological features of rectal cancer.

Sun Y, Tong T, Cai S, Bi R, Xin C, Gu Y.

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 10;9(10):e109371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109371. eCollection 2014.

16.

The usefulness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer staging and functional analysis.

Yamada Y, Kobayashi S, Isoshima S, Arima K, Sakuma H, Sugimura Y.

J Cancer Res Ther. 2014 Oct-Dec;10(4):878-82. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.138225.

17.

Ki-67 MIB1 labelling index and the prognosis of primary TaT1 urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Quintero A, Alvarez-Kindelan J, Luque RJ, Gonzalez-Campora R, Requena MJ, Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A.

J Clin Pathol. 2006 Jan;59(1):83-8.

18.

Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging--accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade.

Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, Ito M, Okada S, Takahashi S, Kawai T, Suzuki K, Oshima H, Hara M, Shibamoto Y.

Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):112-21. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511080873.

PMID:
19332849
19.

Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 in the diagnosis of gliomas.

Yin Y, Tong D, Liu XY, Yuan TT, Yan YZ, Ma Y, Zhao R.

Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2012 Oct;34(5):503-8. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2012.05.012.

20.

Utility of quantitative MRI metrics for assessment of stage and grade of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: preliminary results.

Rosenkrantz AB, Haghighi M, Horn J, Naik M, Hardie AD, Somberg MB, Melamed J, Xiao GQ, Huang WC, Taouli B.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Dec;201(6):1254-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10348.

PMID:
24261364
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk