Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 371

1.

Assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity and location: quantitative analysis of transmural perfusion gradients by high-resolution MRI versus FFR.

Chiribiri A, Hautvast GL, Lockie T, Schuster A, Bigalke B, Olivotti L, Redwood SR, Breeuwer M, Plein S, Nagel E.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 May;6(5):600-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.019. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

2.

Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease.

Jogiya R, Kozerke S, Morton G, De Silva K, Redwood S, Perera D, Nagel E, Plein S.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 21;60(8):756-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.075. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

3.

Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Pan J, Huang S, Lu Z, Li J, Wan Q, Zhang J, Gao C, Yang X, Wei M.

Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 15;115(10):1333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.039. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

PMID:
25796365
4.

Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, Meredith IT, Leong DP, Antonis PR, Crossett M, Troupis J, Harper R, Malaiapan Y, Seneviratne SK.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(11):1097-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.004.

5.

Impact of anatomical and functional severity of coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the transmural perfusion gradient: a [15O]H2O PET study.

Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Harms HJ, Heymans MW, van Royen N, Lubberink M, Boellaard R, van Rossum AC, Lammertsma AA, Knaapen P.

Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 14;35(31):2094-105. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu170. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

6.

Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

Stuijfzand WJ, Uusitalo V, Kero T, Danad I, Rijnierse MT, Saraste A, Raijmakers PG, Lammertsma AA, Harms HJ, Heymans MW, Huisman MC, Marques KM, Kajander SA, Pietilä M, Sörensen J, van Royen N, Knuuti J, Knaapen P.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1). pii: e002400. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002400.

7.

High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve.

Lockie T, Ishida M, Perera D, Chiribiri A, De Silva K, Kozerke S, Marber M, Nagel E, Rezavi R, Redwood S, Plein S.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jan 4;57(1):70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.019. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 29;57(13):1501.

8.

Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla: a comparison to fractional flow reserve.

Bernhardt P, Walcher T, Rottbauer W, Wöhrle J.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Dec;28(8):2049-56. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0037-1. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

PMID:
22476908
9.

CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.

Bettencourt N, Ferreira ND, Leite D, Carvalho M, Ferreira Wda S, Schuster A, Chiribiri A, Leite-Moreira A, Silva-Cardoso J, Nagel E, Gama V.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;6(10):1062-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

10.

Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve.

Yoon YE, Choi JH, Kim JH, Park KW, Doh JH, Kim YJ, Koo BK, Min JK, Erglis A, Gwon HC, Choe YH, Choi DJ, Kim HS, Oh BH, Park YB.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(11):1088-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.002.

11.

Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability.

Ponte M, Bettencourt N, Pereira E, Ferreira ND, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Albuquerque A, Gama V, Nagel E.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Dec;30(8):1589-97. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0492-y. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

PMID:
25082645
12.

Clinical feasibility of accelerated, high spatial resolution myocardial perfusion imaging.

Manka R, Vitanis V, Boesiger P, Flammer AJ, Plein S, Kozerke S.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jul;3(7):710-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.03.009.

13.

Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.

Ebersberger U, Makowski MR, Schoepf UJ, Platz U, Schmidtler F, Rose J, Kessel A, Roth P, Antoni D, Schnackenburg B, Helmberger T, Rieber J, Hoffmann E, Leber AW.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec;14(12):1174-80. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet074. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

14.

Diagnostic accuracy of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction post primary angioplasty.

Wong DT, Leung MC, Das R, Liew GY, Williams K, Dundon BK, Molaee P, Teo KS, Meredith IT, Worthley MI, Worthley SG.

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Oct 22;13:62. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-62.

15.

Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.

Costa MA, Shoemaker S, Futamatsu H, Klassen C, Angiolillo DJ, Nguyen M, Siuciak A, Gilmore P, Zenni MM, Guzman L, Bass TA, Wilke N.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 7;50(6):514-22. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

16.

Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.

Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Ferreira N, Sampaio F, Pires-Morais G, Santos L, Melica B, Rodrigues A, Braga P, Azevedo L, Teixeira M, Leite-Moreira A, Silva-Cardoso J, Nagel E, Gama V.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 12;61(10):1099-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

17.

Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.

Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, De Winter O, Wyffels E, Bartunek J, Heyndrickx GR, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Wijns W, De Bruyne B.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar;3(3):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.010.

18.

Transmural myocardial perfusion gradients in relation to coronary artery stenoses severity assessed by cardiac multidetector computed tomography.

Linde JJ, Kühl JT, Hove JD, Sørgaard M, Kelbæk H, Nielsen WB, Kofoed KF.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;31(1):171-80. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0530-9. Epub 2014 Sep 7.

PMID:
25194436
19.

Myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by T2-prepared steady-state free precession blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to fractional flow reserve.

Walcher T, Manzke R, Hombach V, Rottbauer W, Wöhrle J, Bernhardt P.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):580-6. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

20.

Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.

Manka R, Paetsch I, Kozerke S, Moccetti M, Hoffmann R, Schroeder J, Reith S, Schnackenburg B, Gaemperli O, Wissmann L, Wyss CA, Kaufmann PA, Corti R, Boesiger P, Marx N, Lüscher TF, Jahnke C.

Eur Heart J. 2012 Aug;33(16):2016-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs170. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk