Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 105

1.

Temporal variation of competition and facilitation in mixed species forests in Central Europe.

Del Río M, Schütze G, Pretzsch H.

Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Apr 15. doi: 10.1111/plb.12029. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
23581485
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
2.

Resistance of European tree species to drought stress in mixed versus pure forests: evidence of stress release by inter-specific facilitation.

Pretzsch H, Schütze G, Uhl E.

Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 May;15(3):483-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00670.x. Epub 2012 Oct 15.

PMID:
23062025
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.
4.

Age-related variation in carbon allocation at tree and stand scales in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) using a chronosequence approach.

Genet H, Bréda N, Dufrêne E.

Tree Physiol. 2010 Feb;30(2):177-92. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp105. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

PMID:
20018984
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Does mixing of beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies) litter hasten decomposition?

Berger TW, Berger P.

Plant Soil. 2014 Apr 1;377(1-2):217-234.

PMID:
24744450
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
6.

Growth of adult Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) under free-air ozone fumigation.

Wipfler P, Seifert T, Heerdt C, Werner H, Pretzsch H.

Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2005 Nov;7(6):611-8.

PMID:
16388464
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Space sequestration below ground in old-growth spruce-beech forests-signs for facilitation?

Bolte A, Kampf F, Hilbrig L.

Front Plant Sci. 2013 Aug 20;4:322. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00322. eCollection 2013.

PMID:
24009616
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
8.

Impacts of changing climate on the productivity of Norway spruce dominant stands with a mixture of Scots pine and birch in relation to water availability in southern and northern Finland.

Ge ZM, Kellomäki S, Peltola H, Zhou X, Wang KY, Väisänen H.

Tree Physiol. 2011 Mar;31(3):323-38. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr001. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

PMID:
21436231
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Differential radial growth patterns between beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and oak (Quercus robur L.) on periodically waterlogged soils.

Scharnweber T, Manthey M, Wilmking M.

Tree Physiol. 2013 Apr;33(4):425-37. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt020. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

PMID:
23564694
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Comparing the intra-annual wood formation of three European species (Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris) as related to leaf phenology and non-structural carbohydrate dynamics.

Michelot A, Simard S, Rathgeber C, Dufrêne E, Damesin C.

Tree Physiol. 2012 Aug;32(8):1033-45. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps052. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

PMID:
22718524
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Biomass and nutrient content of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stem and branches in a mixed stand in southern Belgium.

André F, Jonard M, Ponette Q.

Sci Total Environ. 2010 May 1;408(11):2285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.040. Epub 2010 Mar 15.

PMID:
20231032
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Throughfall deposition and canopy exchange processes along a vertical gradient within the canopy of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst).

Adriaenssens S, Hansen K, Staelens J, Wuyts K, De Schrijver A, Baeten L, Boeckx P, Samson R, Verheyen K.

Sci Total Environ. 2012 Mar 15;420:168-82. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.029. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

PMID:
22325986
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Impact of tree species on nutrient stocks in the forest floors of a temperate forest ecosystem.

Bagherzadeh A, Brumme R, Beese F.

Pak J Biol Sci. 2008 May 1;11(9):1258-62.

PMID:
18819535
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

The timing of bud burst and its effect on tree growth.

Rötzer T, Grote R, Pretzsch H.

Int J Biometeorol. 2004 Feb;48(3):109-18. Epub 2003 Oct 15.

PMID:
14564495
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Significance of ozone exposure for inter-annual differences in primary metabolites of old-growth beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) trees in a mixed forest stand.

Alexou M, Hofer N, Liu X, Rennenberg H, Haberer K.

Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2007 Mar;9(2):227-41.

PMID:
17357017
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Monitoring of ozone effects on the vitality and increment of Norway spruce and European beech in the Central European forests.

rámek V, Novotný R, Vejpustková M, Hůnová I, Uhlířová H.

J Environ Monit. 2012 May;14(6):1696-702. doi: 10.1039/c2em10964f. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

PMID:
22534676
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Light and competition gradients fail to explain the coexistence of shade-tolerant Fagus sylvatica and shade-intermediate Quercus petraea seedlings.

Van Couwenberghe R, Gégout JC, Lacombe E, Collet C.

Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(7):1421-30. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct200. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

PMID:
24036670
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Competition modifies effects of enhanced ozone/carbon dioxide concentrations on carbohydrate and biomass accumulation in juvenile Norway spruce and European beech.

Liu X, Kozovits AR, Grams TE, Blaschke H, Rennenberg H, Matyssek R.

Tree Physiol. 2004 Sep;24(9):1045-55.

PMID:
15234902
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Complex climate controls on 20th century oak growth in Central-West Germany.

Friedrichs DA, Büntgen U, Frank DC, Esper J, Neuwirth B, Löffler J.

Tree Physiol. 2009 Jan;29(1):39-51. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn003. Epub 2008 Dec 5.

PMID:
19203931
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk