Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

[Injury to the spinal accessory nerve during lymph node biopsy: expert witnesses and evidence-based procedures].

Fellmer PT, Fellmer J, Jonas S.

Zentralbl Chir. 2014 Dec;139 Suppl 2:e90-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327889. Epub 2013 Apr 10. German.

PMID:
23575521
2.

[Faults and failure of tonsil surgery and other standard procedures in otorhinolaryngology].

Windfuhr JP.

Laryngorhinootologie. 2013 Apr;92 Suppl 1:S33-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333253. Epub 2013 Apr 26. Review. German.

PMID:
23625716
3.
4.

Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis.

Morris LG, Ziff DJ, DeLacure MD.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jan;134(1):102-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.1.102.

PMID:
18209145
7.

Malpractice claims and unintentional outcome of tonsil surgery and other standard procedures in otorhinolaryngology.

Windfuhr JP.

GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec 13;12:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/cto000100. Review.

8.

A comparison of plaintiff and defense expert witness qualifications in malpractice litigation in anesthesiology.

Radvansky BM, Farver WT, Svider PF, Eloy JA, Gubenko YA, Eloy JD.

Anesth Analg. 2015 Jun;120(6):1369-74. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000673.

PMID:
25988639
9.

Surgical outcomes of 156 spinal accessory nerve injuries caused by lymph node biopsy procedures.

Park SH, Esquenazi Y, Kline DG, Kim DH.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Oct;23(4):518-25. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14968. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

PMID:
26115023
10.

[Physician treatment error and legal ramifications] ].

Gusek M.

Chirurg. 2007 Sep;Suppl:312-4. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
18409226
11.

Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in neurological surgery.

Eloy JA, Svider PF, Folbe AJ, Couldwell WT, Liu JK.

J Neurosurg. 2014 Jan;120(1):185-90. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13584. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

PMID:
24074492
12.

Poor agreement among expert witnesses in bile duct injury malpractice litigation: an expert panel survey.

de Reuver PR, Dijkgraaf MG, Gevers SK, Gouma DJ; BILE Study Group.

Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):815-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318186de35.

PMID:
18948809
13.

Evidence-based medicine and tort law.

Foucar E, Wick MR.

Semin Diagn Pathol. 2005 May;22(2):167-76. Review. Erratum in: Semin Diagn Pathol. 2005 Nov;22(4):339.

PMID:
16639995
14.

[Attitudes of dental legal expert witnesses on their present status in Germany and approaches to the development of the profession].

Brauer HU, Riesen C, Walther W, Dick M.

Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Jan;74(1):42-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280755. Epub 2011 Jul 13. German.

PMID:
21755493
15.
16.

The anatomy of the accessory nerve and cervical lymph node biopsy.

Nason RW, Abdulrauf BM, Stranc MF.

Am J Surg. 2000 Sep;180(3):241-3.

PMID:
11084139
17.

[Paralysis of the accessory nerve following operations in the lateral triangle of the neck].

Reichel J, Usbeck W, Mühlan J.

Zentralbl Chir. 1976;101(12):752-7. German.

PMID:
952117
18.

[Skin burns under application of electro-surgical devices: aspects of liability and medicine].

von Harder Y, Scherer MA.

Unfallchirurg. 2002 Dec;105(12):1143-8. German.

PMID:
12486583
19.

Expertise in law, medicine, and health care.

Shuman DW.

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2001 Apr;26(2):267-90. Review.

PMID:
11330081
20.

[Risk disclosure in lymph node excision: not withholding permanent damage].

Wienke RA.

Laryngorhinootologie. 2014 Feb;93(2):119-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1354395. Epub 2014 Jan 29. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
24477435
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk