Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 105

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23565511)

1.

New perspectives in electronic fetal surveillance.

Hamilton EF, Warrick PA.

J Perinat Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):83-92. Review.

PMID:
23565511
2.

New perspectives in electronic fetal surveillance.

Hamilton EF, Warrick PA.

J Perinat Med. 2012 Jun 12;0(0):1-10. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0024.

PMID:
22706227
3.

Fetal health surveillance in labour.

Liston R, Crane J, Hamilton E, Hughes O, Kuling S, MacKinnon C, McNamara H, Milne K, Richardson B, Trépanie MJ; Working Group on Fetal Health Surveillance in Labor, Executive and Council, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Clinical Practice Guidline Committee, and ALARM Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Canada; Canadian Medical Protection Association.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Mar;24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. English, French.

PMID:
12196876
4.

ST analysis of fetal electrocardiography in labor.

Amer-Wåhlin I, Maršál K.

Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Feb;16(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Nov 5. Review.

PMID:
21115414
5.

Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance (replaces ACNM Clinical Bulletin #9, March 2007).

American College of Nurse-Midwives.

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 Jul-Aug;55(4):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.05.007. No abstract available.

PMID:
20630370
6.

Intrapartum fetal assessment. A review.

Huddleston JF.

Clin Perinatol. 1999 Sep;26(3):549-68, v. Review.

PMID:
10494464
7.

Maternal or fetal heart rate? Avoiding intrapartum misidentification.

Murray ML.

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;33(1):93-104.

PMID:
14971558
8.

Birth can be a hazardous journey: electronic fetal monitoring does not help.

Natale R, Dodman N.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003 Dec;25(12):1007-9.

PMID:
14663534
9.

Fetal health surveillance in labour.

Liston R, Crane J, Hughes O, Kuling S, MacKinnon C, Milne K, Richardson B, Trépanier MJ; Fetal Health Surveillance Working Group.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Apr;24(4):342-55. English, French.

PMID:
12196870
10.

Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation.

Ugwumadu A.

BJOG. 2014 Aug;121(9):1063-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12900. Epub 2014 Jun 12. Review. Erratum in: BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):599.

PMID:
24920154
11.

The physiologic and medical rationale for intrapartum fetal monitoring.

Dildy GA.

Biomed Instrum Technol. 1999 Mar-Apr;33(2):143-51. Review.

PMID:
10194567
12.

Failure to rescue as a process measure to evaluate fetal safety during labor.

Beaulieu MJ.

MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):18-23. doi: 10.1097/01.NMC.0000343861.64614.c9.

PMID:
19104315
13.

Use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring in a preterm fetus: clinical dilemmas and recommendations for practice.

Afors K, Chandraharan E.

J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:848794. doi: 10.1155/2011/848794. Epub 2011 Sep 13. Review.

14.

Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.

Graham EM, Petersen SM, Christo DK, Fox HE.

Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):656-66. Review.

PMID:
16946228
15.

Intrauterine resuscitation of the compromised fetus.

Lindsay MK.

Clin Perinatol. 1999 Sep;26(3):569-84, v. Review.

PMID:
10494465
16.

Fetal acoustic stimulation for early intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being.

Chittacharoen A, Chaitum A, Suthutvoravut S, Herabutya Y.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000 Jun;69(3):275-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
10854872
17.

A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.

Vintzileos AM, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Papas C, Sofatzis I, Montgomery JT.

Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;81(6):899-907.

PMID:
8497353
18.

Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: where are we now?

Chez BF, Baird SM.

J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2011 Apr-Jun;25(2):180-92; quiz 193-4. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e31821643c6.

PMID:
21540697
19.

Minimizing perinatal neurologic injury at term: is cesarean section the answer?

Miller R, Depp R.

Clin Perinatol. 2008 Sep;35(3):549-59, xi. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.07.005. Review.

PMID:
18952021
20.

Intrapartum computerized fetal heart rate parameters and metabolic acidosis at birth.

Agrawal SK, Doucette F, Gratton R, Richardson B, Gagnon R.

Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;102(4):731-8.

PMID:
14551003
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk