Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

Incorporating heterogeneous parent-child environmental effects in biometrical genetic models.

Guo X, Liu D, Wen C, He M, Wang X.

Stat Med. 2013 Sep 10;32(20):3501-8. doi: 10.1002/sim.5785. Epub 2013 Apr 7.

PMID:
23564662
2.

Heritability of anterior chamber depth as an intermediate phenotype of angle-closure in Chinese: the Guangzhou Twin Eye Study.

He M, Wang D, Zheng Y, Zhang J, Yin Q, Huang W, Mackey DA, Foster PJ.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jan;49(1):81-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1052.

PMID:
18172078
3.

Genetic and cultural transmission of antisocial behavior: an extended twin parent model.

Maes HH, Silberg JL, Neale MC, Eaves LJ.

Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007 Feb;10(1):136-50.

PMID:
17539373
4.

Estimating heritability and shared environmental effects for refractive error in twin and family studies.

Lopes MC, Andrew T, Carbonaro F, Spector TD, Hammond CJ.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jan;50(1):126-31. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2385. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

PMID:
18757506
5.

A test of the equal environment assumption (EEA) in multivariate twin studies.

Derks EM, Dolan CV, Boomsma DI.

Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Jun;9(3):403-11.

PMID:
16790150
6.

Using non-normal SEM to resolve the ACDE model in the classical twin design.

Ozaki K, Toyoda H, Iwama N, Kubo S, Ando J.

Behav Genet. 2011 Mar;41(2):329-39. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9386-5. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

8.

Contribution of genetic and environmental effects on lens thickness: the Guangzhou Twin Eye study.

Shen P, Ding X, Zheng Y, Congdon NG, He M.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Apr 2;53(4):1758-63. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9318.

PMID:
22395878
9.

A note on the statistical power in extended twin designs.

Posthuma D, Boomsma DI.

Behav Genet. 2000 Mar;30(2):147-58.

PMID:
10979605
10.

Analysis of longitudinal data from twins.

Huggins RM, Hoang NH, Loesch DZ.

Genet Epidemiol. 2000 Dec;19(4):345-53.

PMID:
11108644
11.

Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models.

Keller MC, Medland SE, Duncan LE.

Behav Genet. 2010 May;40(3):377-93. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9320-x. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

12.

Biometrical modeling of twin and family data using standard mixed model software.

Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Gjessing HK.

Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):280-8. Epub 2007 May 2.

PMID:
17484777
13.

Assumptions and properties of limiting pathway models for analysis of epistasis in complex traits.

Stringer S, Derks EM, Kahn RS, Hill WG, Wray NR.

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 30;8(7):e68913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068913. Print 2013.

15.

Shared genetic determinant of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and angle opening distance: the Guangzhou Twin Eye Study.

He M, Hur YM, Zhang J, Ding X, Huang W, Wang D.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Nov;49(11):4790-4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2130. Epub 2008 Jun 27.

PMID:
18586876
16.

Heritability of central corneal thickness in Chinese: the Guangzhou Twin Eye Study.

Zheng Y, Ge J, Huang G, Zhang J, Liu B, Hur YM, He M.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;49(10):4303-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1934. Epub 2008 May 23.

PMID:
18502994
17.
18.

Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design.

Keller MC, Coventry WL.

Twin Res Hum Genet. 2005 Jun;8(3):201-13.

PMID:
15989748
20.

Distribution and heritability of intraocular pressure in chinese children: the Guangzhou twin eye study.

Zheng Y, Xiang F, Huang W, Huang G, Yin Q, He M.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 May;50(5):2040-3. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3082. Epub 2009 Jan 17.

PMID:
19151388
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk