Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Frequency-dependent properties of the tectorial membrane facilitate energy transmission and amplification in the cochlea.

Jones GP, Lukashkina VA, Russell IJ, Elliott SJ, Lukashkin AN.

Biophys J. 2013 Mar 19;104(6):1357-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

2.

Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membrane.

Ghaffari R, Aranyosi AJ, Freeman DM.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16510-5. Epub 2007 Oct 9.

3.

Longitudinal spread of mechanical excitation through tectorial membrane traveling waves.

Sellon JB, Farrahi S, Ghaffari R, Freeman DM.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 20;112(42):12968-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511620112. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

4.

Two-compartment passive frequency domain cochlea model allowing independent fluid coupling to the tectorial and basilar membranes.

Cormack J, Liu Y, Nam JH, Gracewski SM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Mar;137(3):1117-25. doi: 10.1121/1.4908214.

PMID:
25786927
5.

Modified protein expression in the tectorial membrane of the cochlea reveals roles for the striated sheet matrix.

Jones GP, Elliott SJ, Russell IJ, Lukashkin AN.

Biophys J. 2015 Jan 6;108(1):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.1854.

6.

Basilar membrane and tectorial membrane stiffness in the CBA/CaJ mouse.

Teudt IU, Richter CP.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Oct;15(5):675-94. doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0463-y. Epub 2014 May 28.

7.

Tectorial membrane travelling waves underlie abnormal hearing in Tectb mutant mice.

Ghaffari R, Aranyosi AJ, Richardson GP, Freeman DM.

Nat Commun. 2010 Oct 19;1:96. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1094.

8.

Porosity controls spread of excitation in tectorial membrane traveling waves.

Sellon JB, Ghaffari R, Farrahi S, Richardson GP, Freeman DM.

Biophys J. 2014 Mar 18;106(6):1406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.012.

9.

Tectorial membrane stiffness gradients.

Richter CP, Emadi G, Getnick G, Quesnel A, Dallos P.

Biophys J. 2007 Sep 15;93(6):2265-76. Epub 2007 May 11.

10.

Dual traveling waves in an inner ear model with two degrees of freedom.

Lamb JS, Chadwick RS.

Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Aug 19;107(8):088101. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

11.

Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea.

Lee HY, Raphael PD, Park J, Ellerbee AK, Applegate BE, Oghalai JS.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 10;112(10):3128-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500038112. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

12.

Measurement of the mechanical properties of isolated tectorial membrane using atomic force microscopy.

Gueta R, Barlam D, Shneck RZ, Rousso I.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 3;103(40):14790-5. Epub 2006 Sep 25.

13.

The effect of tectorial membrane and basilar membrane longitudinal coupling in cochlear mechanics.

Meaud J, Grosh K.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Mar;127(3):1411-21. doi: 10.1121/1.3290995.

14.

Dynamic material properties of the tectorial membrane: a summary.

Freeman DM, Abnet CC, Hemmert W, Tsai BS, Weiss TF.

Hear Res. 2003 Jun;180(1-2):1-10. Review.

PMID:
12782348
16.

Phase of shear vibrations within cochlear partition leads to activation of the cochlear amplifier.

Lamb JS, Chadwick RS.

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 14;9(2):e85969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085969. eCollection 2014.

17.

Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane.

Russell IJ, Legan PK, Lukashkina VA, Lukashkin AN, Goodyear RJ, Richardson GP.

Nat Neurosci. 2007 Feb;10(2):215-23. Epub 2007 Jan 14.

19.

Role of inner and outer hair cells in mechanical frequency selectivity of the cochlea.

Strelioff D, Flock A, Minser KE.

Hear Res. 1985 May;18(2):169-75.

PMID:
4044418
20.

Vibration responses of the organ of Corti and the tectorial membrane to electrical stimulation.

Nowotny M, Gummer AW.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):3852-72. doi: 10.1121/1.3651822.

PMID:
22225042
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk