Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 116

1.

Tolerability of 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring of a pressure-sensitive contact lens.

Lorenz K, Korb C, Herzog N, Vetter JM, Elflein H, Keilani MM, Pfeiffer N.

J Glaucoma. 2013 Apr-May;22(4):311-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318241b874.

PMID:
23524857
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation monitoring using an ocular telemetry Sensor: tolerability and functionality in healthy subjects.

De Smedt S, Mermoud A, Schnyder C.

J Glaucoma. 2012 Oct-Nov;21(8):539-44. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821dac43.

PMID:
21602707
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

[Continuous 24 h monitoring of changes in intraocular pressure with the wireless contact lens sensor Triggerfish™. First results in patients].

Faschinger C, Mossböck G.

Ophthalmologe. 2010 Oct;107(10):918-22. doi: 10.1007/s00347-010-2198-4. German.

PMID:
20535482
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Continuous 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor: safety, tolerability, and reproducibility in patients with glaucoma.

Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tafreshi A, Weinreb RN.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;130(12):1534-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1350.

PMID:
23229696
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

24-hour intraocular pressure rhythm in young healthy subjects evaluated with continuous monitoring using a contact lens sensor.

Mottet B, Aptel F, Romanet JP, Hubanova R, Pépin JL, Chiquet C.

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1507-16. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5297.

PMID:
24158696
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Corneal thickness after overnight wear of an intraocular pressure fluctuation contact lens sensor.

Freiberg FJ, Lindell J, Thederan LA, Leippi S, Shen Y, Klink T.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;90(7):e534-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02495.x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

PMID:
22974389
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Continuous intraocular pressure monitoring with a wireless ocular telemetry sensor: initial clinical experience in patients with open angle glaucoma.

Mansouri K, Shaarawy T.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 May;95(5):627-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.192922. Epub 2011 Jan 7.

PMID:
21216796
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Comparative measurement of intraocular pressure by Icare tonometry and Airpuff tonometry in healthy subjects and patients wearing therapeutic soft contact lenses.

Anton A, Neuburger M, Böhringer D, Jordan JF.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;251(7):1791-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2329-0. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

PMID:
23532453
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Analysis of continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure patterns in glaucoma.

Mansouri K, Liu JH, Weinreb RN, Tafreshi A, Medeiros FA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Dec 13;53(13):8050-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10569.

PMID:
23139273
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
10.

Continuous monitoring of intraocular pressure: rationale and progress toward a clinical device.

Sit AJ.

J Glaucoma. 2009 Apr-May;18(4):272-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181862490. Review.

PMID:
19365190
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring for glaucoma--time for a paradigm change.

Mansouri K, Weinreb R.

Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Mar 28;142:w13545. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13545. Review.

PMID:
22457163
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
12.

Continuous 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor: safety, tolerability, and reproducibility in patients with glaucoma.

Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tafreshi A, Weinreb RN.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;130(12):1534-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2280.

PMID:
22892888
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
14.

Meeting an unmet need in glaucoma: continuous 24-h monitoring of intraocular pressure.

Mansouri K, Weinreb RN.

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012 May;9(3):225-31. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.14. Review.

PMID:
22702252
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Correlation between diurnal variation of intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude and corneal structural properties.

Villas-Bôas FS, Doi LM, Sousa AK, Melo LA Jr.

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009 May-Jun;72(3):296-301.

PMID:
19668956
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
16.

Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma.

Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Hautenauven F, Pourjavan S.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;90(2):e118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02274.x. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

PMID:
21989354
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Association of central corneal thickness and 24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation.

Mosaed S, Chamberlain WD, Liu JH, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN.

J Glaucoma. 2008 Mar;17(2):85-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31814b9922.

PMID:
18344752
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Oh JH, Yoo C, Kim YY, Kim HM, Song JS.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;247(3):371-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0954-9. Epub 2008 Oct 9.

PMID:
18843499
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

[Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry].

Domke N, Hager A, Wiegand W.

Ophthalmologe. 2006 Jul;103(7):583-7. German.

PMID:
16786183
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk