Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 396

1.

A cross-sectional study comparing the rates of osteoarthritis, laxity, and quality of life in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Kievit AJ, Jonkers FJ, Barentsz JH, Blankevoort L.

Arthroscopy. 2013 May;29(5):898-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.020. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

PMID:
23523126
2.

Outcomes of repeat revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Griffith TB, Allen BJ, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Dahm DL.

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1296-301. doi: 10.1177/0363546513482568. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

PMID:
23605223
3.

Primary versus single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective matched-group analysis.

Weiler A, Schmeling A, Stöhr I, Kääb MJ, Wagner M.

Am J Sports Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):1643-52. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

PMID:
17575015
4.

A prospective study to assess the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Mahmoud SS, Odak S, Coogan S, McNicholas MJ.

Int Orthop. 2014 Jul;38(7):1489-94. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2324-z. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

5.

Medium-term (5-year) comparison of the functional outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction compared with isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Cartwright-Terry M, Yates J, Tan CK, Pengas IP, Banks JV, McNicholas MJ.

Arthroscopy. 2014 Jul;30(7):811-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.039. Epub 2014 May 1.

PMID:
24794571
6.

Functional outcomes of Y-graft double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee.

Lao ML, Chen JH, Wang CJ, Siu KK.

Arthroscopy. 2013 Sep;29(9):1525-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

PMID:
23910003
7.

Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions.

Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB.

Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1551-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512446000. Epub 2012 May 4.

PMID:
22562791
8.

Revision rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft or autograft in a population 25 years old and younger.

Barber FA, Cowden CH 3rd, Sanders EJ.

Arthroscopy. 2014 Apr;30(4):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.022.

PMID:
24680308
9.

Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? a prospective randomized study.

Lund B, Nielsen T, Faunø P, Christiansen SE, Lind M.

Arthroscopy. 2014 May;30(5):593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

PMID:
24630956
10.

Patient-reported knee function, quality of life, and activity level after bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Fältström A, Hägglund M, Kvist J.

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2805-13. doi: 10.1177/0363546513502309. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

PMID:
24007758
11.

A prospective randomized comparison of irradiated and non-irradiated hamstring tendon allograft for ACL reconstruction.

Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang C, Xia C, Yu T, Tian S.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):187-94. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1393-9. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

PMID:
21290113
12.

Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S.

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1598-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571571. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

PMID:
25740835
13.

Repeat revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective review of management and outcome of 10 patients with an average 3-year follow-up.

Wegrzyn J, Chouteau J, Philippot R, Fessy MH, Moyen B.

Am J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):776-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546508330141.

PMID:
19336620
14.

Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: any clinical relevance? A retrospective comparative study.

Franceschi F, Papalia R, Rizzello G, Del Buono A, Maffulli N, Denaro V.

Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug;29(8):1330-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.020.

PMID:
23906273
15.

Does physiologic posterolateral laxity influence clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Kim SJ, Choi DH, Mei Y, Hwang BY.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 2;93(21):2010-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01868.

PMID:
22048096
16.

A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autograft, γ-Irradiated Allograft, and Hybrid Graft.

Li J, Wang J, Li Y, Shao D, You X, Shen Y.

Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul;31(7):1296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.033. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

PMID:
25891223
17.
18.

No difference in revision rates between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative study of 16,791 patients from the Swedish national knee ligament register.

Björnsson H, Andernord D, Desai N, Norrby O, Forssblad M, Petzold M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K.

Arthroscopy. 2015 Apr;31(4):659-64. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.030. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

PMID:
25618489
19.

Medium to long-term follow-up after ACL revision.

Lind M, Lund B, Faunø P, Said S, Miller LL, Christiansen SE.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):166-72. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1629-3. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

PMID:
21800165
20.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibial or hamstring tendon allografts.

Reverte-Vinaixa MM, Minguell J, Joshi N, Diaz-Ferreiro EW, Duarri G, Carrera L, Castellet E.

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Apr;22(1):60-4.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk