Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 103

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23522294)

1.

Trends in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients.

Monn MF, Bahler CD, Schneider EB, Whittam BM, Misseri R, Rink RC, Sundaram CP.

Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.025. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

PMID:
23522294
2.

National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty.

Varda BK, Johnson EK, Clark C, Chung BI, Nelson CP, Chang SL.

J Urol. 2014 Apr;191(4):1090-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.077. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

3.

Emerging trends in robotic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.

Monn MF, Bahler CD, Schneider EB, Sundaram CP.

J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

PMID:
23063631
4.

Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery.

Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, Peters CA.

J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):683-7; discussion 687.

PMID:
16407025
5.

Cost analysis of pediatric robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Casella DP, Fox JA, Schneck FX, Cannon GM, Ost MC.

J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):1083-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.259. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

PMID:
23017518
6.

Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty.

Liu DB, Ellimoottil C, Flum AS, Casey JT, Gong EM.

J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Aug;10(4):610-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jul 11.

PMID:
25082711
7.

Human capital gains associated with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children compared to open pyeloplasty.

Behan JW, Kim SS, Dorey F, De Filippo RE, Chang AY, Hardy BE, Koh CJ.

J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4 Suppl):1663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.019.

PMID:
21862079
8.

Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a Pediatric Health Information System database study.

Vemulakonda VM, Cowan CA, Lendvay TS, Joyner BD, Grady RW.

J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4 Suppl):1689-92; discussion 1692. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.096. Epub 2008 Aug 16.

PMID:
18708209
9.

The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States.

Anderson JE, Chang DC, Parsons JK, Talamini MA.

J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jul;215(1):107-14; discussion 114-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 May 4.

PMID:
22560318
10.

Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.

Freilich DA, Penna FJ, Nelson CP, Retik AB, Nguyen HT.

J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.040. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

PMID:
20022046
11.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.

Lindgren BW, Hagerty J, Meyer T, Cheng EY.

J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.118. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22819409
12.

Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Atug F, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R.

Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Jan;60(1):9-11.

PMID:
16409421
13.

Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.

Riachy E, Cost NG, Defoor WR, Reddy PP, Minevich EA, Noh PH.

J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

PMID:
23174238
14.

Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R.

J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1440-2.

PMID:
16145459
15.

Population-based comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.

Knoedler J, Han L, Granberg C, Kramer S, Chow G, Gettman M, Kimball B, Moriarty J, Kim S, Husmann D.

BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1141-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12039. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

PMID:
23510261
16.

Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group.

Lucas SM, Sundaram CP, Wolf JS Jr, Leveillee RJ, Bird VG, Aziz M, Pautler SE, Luke P, Erdeljan P, Baldwin DD, Ebrahimi K, Nadler RB, Rebuck D, Thomas R, Lee BR, Boylu U, Figenshau RS, Munver R, Averch TD, Gayed B, Shalhav AL, Gundeti MS, Castle EP, Anderson JK, Duffey BG, Landman J, Okhunov Z, Wong C, Strom KH.

J Urol. 2012 Feb;187(2):522-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.158. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

PMID:
22177178
17.

Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.

Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, Rodriguez E, Eichel L, Rajpoot D.

Urology. 2006 Mar;67(3):599-602. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

PMID:
16504272
18.

A minimal invasive surgical approach for children of all ages with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Subotic U, Rohard I, Weber DM, Gobet R, Moehrlen U, Gonzalez R.

J Pediatr Urol. 2012 Aug;8(4):354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

PMID:
21802371
19.

Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a single center experience.

Singh P, Dogra PN, Kumar R, Gupta NP, Nayak B, Seth A.

J Endourol. 2012 Mar;26(3):249-53. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0350. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

PMID:
22191495
20.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience.

Palese MA, Stifelman MD, Munver R, Sosa RE, Philipps CK, Dinlenc C, Del Pizzo JJ.

J Endourol. 2005 Apr;19(3):382-6.

PMID:
15865532
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk