Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 203

1.

Sensitivity and specificity of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials (SD-tVEP) in discriminating normal from glaucomatous eyes.

Pillai C, Ritch R, Derr P, Gonzalez A, Kopko Cox L, Siegfried J, Liebmann JM, Tello C.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Apr 23;54(4):2847-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10097.

PMID:
23513061
2.

Short duration transient visual evoked potentials in glaucomatous eyes.

Prata TS, Lima VC, De Moraes CG, Trubnik V, Derr P, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Tello C.

J Glaucoma. 2012 Aug;21(6):415-20. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182182551.

PMID:
21562431
3.

Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects.

Tello C, De Moraes CG, Prata TS, Derr P, Patel J, Siegfried J, Liebmann JM, Ritch R.

Doc Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;120(3):219-28. doi: 10.1007/s10633-010-9216-3. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

4.

Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

Parisi V, Miglior S, Manni G, Centofanti M, Bucci MG.

Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):216-28. Epub 2006 Jan 10.

PMID:
16406535
5.

Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Bengtsson B.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Dec;80(6):620-6.

6.

Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.

Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1173-80.

PMID:
17325161
7.

Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.

Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR.

Ophthalmology. 2002 Jun;109(6):1052-8.

PMID:
12045043
8.

Glaucoma diagnostics.

Geimer SA.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;91 Thesis 1:1-32. doi: 10.1111/aos.12072.

9.

Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.

Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 21;52(10):7325-31. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7795.

PMID:
21810975
10.

Diagnostic performance of visual field test using subsets of the 24-2 test pattern for early glaucomatous field loss.

Wang Y, Henson DB.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 28;54(1):756-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10468.

PMID:
23258149
11.

Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.

Kook MS, Cho HS, Seong M, Choi J.

Ophthalmology. 2005 Nov;112(11):1970-8. Epub 2005 Sep 26.

PMID:
16185765
12.

Comparison of objective diagnostic tests in glaucoma: Heidelberg retinal tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Balachandran C, Graham SL, Klistorner A, Goldberg I.

J Glaucoma. 2006 Apr;15(2):110-6.

PMID:
16633223
13.

Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.

Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y; Tajimi Study Group.

Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):27-32. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

PMID:
17070580
14.

GDx-VCC performance in discriminating normal from glaucomatous eyes with early visual field loss.

Da Pozzo S, Fuser M, Vattovani O, Di Stefano G, Ravalico G.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;244(6):689-95. Epub 2005 Nov 16.

PMID:
16292656
15.

Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.

Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner AI.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):29-39.

PMID:
11755837
16.

Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.

Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar;129(3):314-22.

PMID:
10704546
17.

Variable corneal compensation improves discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes with the scanning laser polarimeter.

Tannenbaum DP, Hoffman D, Lemij HG, Garway-Heath DF, Greenfield DS, Caprioli J.

Ophthalmology. 2004 Feb;111(2):259-64.

PMID:
15019373
18.

Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.

Mousa MF, Cubbidge RP, Al-Mansouri F, Bener A.

Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;28(1):49-65. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.1.49. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

19.

Reproducibility in the global indices for multifocal visual evoked potentials and Humphrey visual fields in controls and glaucomatous eyes within a 2-year period.

Inoue Y, Kato K, Kamata S, Ishikawa K, Nakamura M.

Doc Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct;131(2):115-24. doi: 10.1007/s10633-015-9506-x. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

PMID:
26078041
20.

Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT).

Nouri-Mahdavi K, Nikkhou K, Hoffman DC, Law SK, Caprioli J.

J Glaucoma. 2008 Apr-May;17(3):183-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815768c4.

PMID:
18414102
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk