Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 116

1.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of 3-D computerized tomography colonography versus optical colonoscopy for imaging symptomatic gastroenterology patients.

Gomes M, Aldridge RW, Wylie P, Bell J, Epstein O.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Apr;11(2):107-17. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0019-z.

PMID:
23512599
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.

Lee D, Muston D, Sweet A, Cunningham C, Slater A, Lock K.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(3):141-54. doi: 10.2165/11535650-000000000-00000.

PMID:
20369905
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Kim DH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1332-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2646.

PMID:
19380558
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.

Lucidarme O, Cadi M, Berger G, Taieb J, Poynard T, Grenier P, Beresniak A.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jul;81(7):1413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Mar 27.

PMID:
21444171
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Morini S.

Cancer. 2007 Jun 1;109(11):2213-21.

PMID:
17455218
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.

Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Rutter CM, Savarino JE, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM, Zauber AG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Aug 18;102(16):1238-52. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq242. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

PMID:
20664028
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
7.

Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.

Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A, Kim DH, Zullo A, Iafrate F, Di Giulio L, Morini S.

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Apr 14;168(7):696-705. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.7.696. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 23;168(12):1269. Pickhardt, Perry [corrected to Pickhardt, Perry J]; Kim, Daniel [corrected to Kim, Daniel H]. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Aug 11;168(15):1710.

PMID:
18413551
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Hanly P, Skally M, Fenlon H, Sharp L.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Oct;28(4):415-23. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000542. Epub 2012 Sep 24. Review.

PMID:
23006522
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.

Hassan C, Zullo A, Laghi A, Reitano I, Taggi F, Cerro P, Iafrate F, Giustini M, Winn S, Morini S.

Dig Liver Dis. 2007 Mar;39(3):242-50. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

PMID:
17112797
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Measurement of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic testing strategies for deep vein thrombosis.

Goodacre S, Sampson F, Stevenson M, Wailoo A, Sutton A, Thomas S, Locker T, Ryan A.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 May;10(15):1-168, iii-iv. Review.

PMID:
16707072
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
11.

Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study).

Sali L, Grazzini G, Carozzi F, Castiglione G, Falchini M, Mallardi B, Mantellini P, Ventura L, Regge D, Zappa M, Mascalchi M, Milani S.

Trials. 2013 Mar 15;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-74.

PMID:
23497601
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Garside R, Pitt M, Anderson R, Rogers G, Dyer M, Mealing S, Somerville M, Price A, Stein K.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. Review.

PMID:
17999840
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
13.

The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.

Vijan S, Hwang I, Inadomi J, Wong RK, Choi JR, Napierkowski J, Koff JM, Pickhardt PJ.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;102(2):380-90. Epub 2006 Dec 11.

PMID:
17156139
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?

Kriza C, Emmert M, Wahlster P, Niederländer C, Kolominsky-Rabas P.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Nov;82(11):e629-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 12. Review.

PMID:
23938237
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.

Fox M, Mealing S, Anderson R, Dean J, Stein K, Price A, Taylor RS.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. Review.

PMID:
17999842
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
16.

Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.

Vanness DJ, Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Rutter CM, Gareen IF, Herman BA, Kuntz KM, Zauber AG, van Ballegooijen M, Feuer EJ, Chen MH, Johnson CD.

Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):487-98. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102411. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

PMID:
21813740
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
17.

At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.

Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Boer R, Wilschut J, Habbema JD.

Int J Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;124(5):1161-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24025.

PMID:
19048626
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
18.

Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.

Garside R, Pitt M, Somerville M, Stein K, Price A, Gilbert N.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. Review.

PMID:
16545207
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography: a prospective comparison with colonoscopy.

Arnesen RB, Ginnerup-Pedersen B, Poulsen PB, von Benzon E, Adamsen S, Laurberg S, Hart-Hansen O.

Acta Radiol. 2007 Apr;48(3):259-66.

PMID:
17453492
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Main C, Bojke L, Griffin S, Norman G, Barbieri M, Mather L, Stark D, Palmer S, Riemsma R.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. Review.

PMID:
16545208
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk