Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

The effect of clinical performance on the survival estimates of direct restorations.

Kim KL, Namgung C, Cho BH.

Restor Dent Endod. 2013 Feb;38(1):11-20. doi: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.11. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

PMID:
23493438
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
2.

Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.

Rho YJ, Namgung C, Jin BH, Lim BS, Cho BH.

Oper Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):572-82. doi: 10.2341/12-432-C. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

PMID:
23550914
[PubMed - in process]
3.

A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.

Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA.

Dent Mater. 2007 Jan;23(1):2-8. Epub 2006 Jan 18.

PMID:
16417916
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.

van Dijken JW, Pallesen U.

Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Apr;14(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0287-z. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

PMID:
19504133
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations.

Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA.

J Adhes Dent. 2007 Oct;9(5):469-75.

PMID:
18297828
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis.

Heintze SD, Rousson V.

J Adhes Dent. 2012 Aug;14(5):407-31. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a28390.

PMID:
23082310
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.

Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Jorge MF, Navarro MF.

Oper Dent. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):403-8.

PMID:
16924979
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.

van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlén M.

J Dent Res. 1999 Jul;78(7):1319-25.

PMID:
10403459
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.

van Dijken JW.

J Dent. 2000 Jul;28(5):299-306.

PMID:
10785294
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.
11.

A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.

da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguércio AD, Demarco FF.

J Dent. 2006 Aug;34(7):427-35. Epub 2005 Nov 28.

PMID:
16314023
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.

Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL.

J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Oct;130(10):1459-66.

PMID:
10570589
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.

Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, DeRouen TA.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Jun;138(6):775-83.

PMID:
17545266
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: Results from a paediatric dental clinic.

Pinto GD, Oliveira LJ, Romano AR, Schardosim LR, Bonow ML, Pacce M, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Torriani DD.

J Dent. 2014 Aug 20. pii: S0300-5712(14)00239-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.005. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25150105
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
15.

Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.

Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, van Dijken JW, Funegård U, Lindberg A, Nilsson M.

J Dent. 2009 Sep;37(9):673-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 May 4.

PMID:
19477572
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.

Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC.

J Dent. 2012 Oct;40(10):829-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

PMID:
22771415
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.

Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT.

Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Feb;62(1):37-45.

PMID:
15124781
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.
19.

Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth.

Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V.

J Dent. 2003 Aug;31(6):395-405.

PMID:
12878022
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

The survival and clinical performance of resin-based composite restorations used to treat localised anterior tooth wear.

Redman CD, Hemmings KW, Good JA.

Br Dent J. 2003 May 24;194(10):566-72; discussion 559.

PMID:
12819732
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk