Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 91

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23479651)

1.

Ring cycle for dilating and constricting the nuclear pore.

Solmaz SR, Blobel G, Melcák I.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5858-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302655110. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

2.

Molecular architecture of the transport channel of the nuclear pore complex.

Solmaz SR, Chauhan R, Blobel G, Melčák I.

Cell. 2011 Oct 28;147(3):590-602. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.034.

3.

The stoichiometry of the nucleoporin 62 subcomplex of the nuclear pore in solution.

Ulrich A, Partridge JR, Schwartz TU.

Mol Biol Cell. 2014 May;25(9):1484-92. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-12-0745. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

4.

Structure of Nup58/45 suggests flexible nuclear pore diameter by intermolecular sliding.

Melcák I, Hoelz A, Blobel G.

Science. 2007 Mar 23;315(5819):1729-32.

5.

Assembly of Nsp1 nucleoporins provides insight into nuclear pore complex gating.

Gamini R, Han W, Stone JE, Schulten K.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Mar 13;10(3):e1003488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003488. eCollection 2014 Mar.

6.

Arabidopsis TRANSCURVATA1 encodes NUP58, a component of the nucleopore central channel.

Ferrández-Ayela A, Alonso-Peral MM, Sánchez-García AB, Micol-Ponce R, Pérez-Pérez JM, Micol JL, Ponce MR.

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 28;8(6):e67661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067661. Print 2013.

7.
8.

The mechanism of nucleocytoplasmic transport through the nuclear pore complex.

Tetenbaum-Novatt J, Rout MP.

Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010;75:567-84. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2010.75.033. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

PMID:
21447814
9.

Deciphering networks of protein interactions at the nuclear pore complex.

Allen NP, Patel SS, Huang L, Chalkley RJ, Burlingame A, Lutzmann M, Hurt EC, Rexach M.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002 Dec;1(12):930-46.

10.

Rapid evolution exposes the boundaries of domain structure and function in natively unfolded FG nucleoporins.

Denning DP, Rexach MF.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007 Feb;6(2):272-82. Epub 2006 Nov 1.

11.

The permeability of reconstituted nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model.

Hülsmann BB, Labokha AA, Görlich D.

Cell. 2012 Aug 17;150(4):738-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.019.

12.

Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: the FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded.

Denning DP, Patel SS, Uversky V, Fink AL, Rexach M.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4;100(5):2450-5. Epub 2003 Feb 25.

13.

Nuclear transport is becoming crystal clear.

Madrid AS, Weis K.

Chromosoma. 2006 Apr;115(2):98-109. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
16421734
14.

Distinct functions of the Drosophila Nup153 and Nup214 FG domains in nuclear protein transport.

Sabri N, Roth P, Xylourgidis N, Sadeghifar F, Adler J, Samakovlis C.

J Cell Biol. 2007 Aug 13;178(4):557-65. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

15.

A gradient of affinity for the karyopherin Kap95p along the yeast nuclear pore complex.

Pyhtila B, Rexach M.

J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 24;278(43):42699-709. Epub 2003 Aug 12.

17.

Flexible gates: dynamic topologies and functions for FG nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport.

Terry LJ, Wente SR.

Eukaryot Cell. 2009 Dec;8(12):1814-27. doi: 10.1128/EC.00225-09. Epub 2009 Oct 2. Review.

18.

Efficiency, selectivity, and robustness of nucleocytoplasmic transport.

Zilman A, Di Talia S, Chait BT, Rout MP, Magnasco MO.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Jul;3(7):e125.

19.

Nuclear mRNA export requires specific FG nucleoporins for translocation through the nuclear pore complex.

Terry LJ, Wente SR.

J Cell Biol. 2007 Sep 24;178(7):1121-32. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

20.

Systematic analysis of barrier-forming FG hydrogels from Xenopus nuclear pore complexes.

Labokha AA, Gradmann S, Frey S, Hülsmann BB, Urlaub H, Baldus M, Görlich D.

EMBO J. 2013 Jan 23;32(2):204-18. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.302. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk