Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 216

1.

Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging?

Alakhras M, Bourne R, Rickard M, Ng KH, Pietrzyk M, Brennan PC.

Clin Radiol. 2013 May;68(5):e225-36. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 5. Review.

PMID:
23465326
2.

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.

Skaane P, Gullien R, Bjørndal H, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, Jahr G, Jebsen IN, Krager M.

Acta Radiol. 2012 Jun 1;53(5):524-9. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120062. Epub 2012 May 16.

PMID:
22593120
3.

Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.

Seo N, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Cha JH, Kim H, Moon JH, Gong G, Ahn SH, Son BH.

Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):661-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113503636. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

PMID:
24005560
4.

Tomosynthesis improves breast cancer detection: our experience.

Zervoudis S, Iatrakis G, Malakassis P, Tomara E, Bouga A, Grammatikakis I, Bothou A, Stefos T, Navrozoglou I.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35(6):666-9.

PMID:
25556272
5.
6.

Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.

Gennaro G, Hendrick RE, Toledano A, Paquelet JR, Bezzon E, Chersevani R, di Maggio C, La Grassa M, Pescarini L, Polico I, Proietti A, Baldan E, Pomerri F, Muzzio PC.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2087-94. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2831-0. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

PMID:
23620367
7.

Digital breast tomosynthesis.

Baldwin P.

Radiol Technol. 2009 Sep-Oct;81(1):57M-74M. Review.

PMID:
19738189
8.

Breast tomosynthesis.

Diekmann F, Bick U.

Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011 Aug;32(4):281-7. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.03.002. Review.

PMID:
21782118
9.

Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection.

Houssami N, Skaane P.

Breast. 2013 Apr;22(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.017. Epub 2013 Feb 16. Review.

PMID:
23422255
10.

A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images.

Vecchio S, Albanese A, Vignoli P, Taibi A.

Eur Radiol. 2011 Jun;21(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2041-y. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

PMID:
21193910
11.

The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.

Shaheen E, Van Ongeval C, Zanca F, Cockmartin L, Marshall N, Jacobs J, Young KC, R Dance D, Bosmans H.

Med Phys. 2011 Dec;38(12):6659-71. doi: 10.1118/1.3662868.

PMID:
22149848
12.

Digital mammography: an update.

Schulz-Wendtland R, Fuchsjäger M, Wacker T, Hermann KP.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):258-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.052. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

PMID:
19592186
13.

Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography.

Svane G, Azavedo E, Lindman K, Urech M, Nilsson J, Weber N, Lindqvist L, Ullberg C.

Acta Radiol. 2011 Mar 1;52(2):134-42. doi: 10.1258/ar.2010.100262.

PMID:
21498340
14.

Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.

Durand MA, Haas BM, Yao X, Geisel JL, Raghu M, Hooley RJ, Horvath LJ, Philpotts LE.

Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):85-92. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131319. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

PMID:
25188431
15.

Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography.

Förnvik D, Zackrisson S, Ljungberg O, Svahn T, Timberg P, Tingberg A, Andersson I.

Acta Radiol. 2010 Apr;51(3):240-7. doi: 10.3109/02841850903524447.

PMID:
20105090
16.

Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.

Skaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB, Jebsen IN, Krager M, Haakenaasen U, Ekseth U, Izadi M, Hofvind S, Gullien R.

Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):655-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131391. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

PMID:
24484063
17.

Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.

Greenberg JS, Javitt MC, Katzen J, Michael S, Holland AE.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep;203(3):687-93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12642. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

PMID:
24918774
18.

Why should breast tumour detection go three dimensional?

Chen Z, Ning R.

Phys Med Biol. 2003 Jul 21;48(14):2217-28.

PMID:
12894980
19.

Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens.

Tucker AW, Calliste J, Gidcumb EM, Wu J, Kuzmiak CM, Hyun N, Zeng D, Lu J, Zhou O, Lee YZ.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

20.

Use of digital breast tomosynthesis with mammography for breast cancer screening or diagnosis.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association; Kaiser Foundation Health Plan; Southern California Permanente Medical Group.

Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ. 2014 Jan;28(6):1-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
24730082
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk