Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 133

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23463617)

1.

A good manuscript review for the European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing.

Jaarsma T, Strömberg A, Årestedt K, Broström A, Kärner A, Mårtensson J, Moons P, Thylén I, Thompson DR.

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Apr;12(2):102-3. doi: 10.1177/1474515113476605. No abstract available.

PMID:
23463617
2.

[The process of external peer review of manuscripts submitted for publication to Enfermería Clínica].

Moreno-Casbas T, Fuentelsaz-Gallego C, Ruzafa-Martínez M, Puigblanqué-Reyes E.

Enferm Clin. 2008 Sep-Oct;18(5):229-31. Spanish. No abstract available.

PMID:
18840330
3.

Essential criteria for manuscript review.

Toth LA, Compton S, Tolwani R, Bagaglio MH.

Comp Med. 2010 Jun;60(3):176. No abstract available.

4.

Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.

Popp RL.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 4;46(7):1360-1. No abstract available.

5.

Effectiveness of a reference accuracy strategy for peer-reviewed journal articles.

Speck KE, St Pierre Schneider B.

Nurse Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):265-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000435272.47774.51.

PMID:
24157676
6.

Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.

Liesegang TJ.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.020. No abstract available.

PMID:
24929824
7.

Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.

Jefferson T, Shashok K.

Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):209-10. No abstract available.

PMID:
12529609
8.

Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.

Giles J.

Nature. 2006 Jan 19;439(7074):252. No abstract available.

PMID:
16421533
9.

Your paper has been accepted for publication.

Munk-Jørgensen P, Christiansen B, Licht RW.

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010 Jan;121(1):1-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01515.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
20059451
10.

The peer review process (aka peer reviewology).

Yucha CB.

Biol Res Nurs. 2002 Oct;4(2):71-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
12408212
11.

CONSORT and beyond.

Blackstone EH.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):229-32. No abstract available.

PMID:
16872939
12.

Three cheers for peers.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2006 Jan 12;439(7073):118. No abstract available.

PMID:
16407911
13.

The politics of publication.

Lawrence PA.

Nature. 2003 Mar 20;422(6929):259-61. No abstract available.

PMID:
12646895
14.

Peer review under review.

Nicholls RD.

Science. 1999 Dec 3;286(5446):1853. No abstract available.

PMID:
10610572
15.

[How to reward and stimulate the task of reviewing scientific articles?].

Muccioli C, Campos M, Goldchmit M, Dantas PE, Bechara SJ, Costa VP.

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007 Jan-Feb;70(1):5. Portuguese. No abstract available.

16.

Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.

Michell B.

Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. No abstract available.

PMID:
12774094
17.

Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals.

Bordeaux BC, Wiley C, Tandon SD, Horowitz CR, Brown PB, Bass EB.

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2007 Fall;1(3):281-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0018.

18.

Parasitology thanks the Referees of 2011.

Phillips S.

Parasitology. 2012 Jun;139(7):825. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012000650. No abstract available.

PMID:
22640992
19.

Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited.

Ioannidis JP, Tatsioni A, Karassa FB.

Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Apr;40(4):285-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02272.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
20486989
20.

Journals should set a new standard in transparency.

Dellavalle RP, Lundahl K, Freeman SR, Schilling LM.

Nature. 2007 Jan 25;445(7126):364. No abstract available.

PMID:
17251958
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk