Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 131

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 23458475)

1.

Real-ear output measures of ear level fluency devices.

Stuart A, Butler AK, Jones SM, Jones TA.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jun;52(6):413-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.770567. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

PMID:
23458475
2.
3.

On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.

Suelzle D, Parsa V, Falk TH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):EL412-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4802186.

PMID:
23656102
4.

Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.

Parsa V, Scollie S, Glista D, Seelisch A.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):54-68. doi: 10.1177/1084713813480856.

5.

Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.

Moore BC, Popelka GR.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Oct;52(10):678-86. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.809483. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

PMID:
23859058
6.

Prescription of hearing-aid output for tinnitus relief.

Shekhawat GS, Searchfield GD, Kobayashi K, Stinear CM.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Sep;52(9):617-25. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.799787. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

PMID:
23859059
7.

Differences in sensation level between the Widex Soundtracker and two real-ear analyzers.

Oeding K, Valente M.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Sep;24(8):660-70. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.8.3.

PMID:
24131602
9.

Real ear measurement methods for open fit hearing aids: modified pressure concurrent equalization (MPCE) versus modified pressure stored equalization (MPSE).

Aazh H, Moore BC, Prasher D.

Int J Audiol. 2012 Feb;51(2):103-7. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.609182. Epub 2011 Oct 24.

PMID:
22023487
10.

Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.

Chen J, Baer T, Moore BC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):2910-20. doi: 10.1121/1.4799807.

PMID:
23654396
11.

Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.

Hockley NS, Bahlmann F, Fulton B.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Sep;16(3):146-58. doi: 10.1177/1084713812471906.

12.
13.

Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.

Sabin AT, Souza PE.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Jun;17(2):94-107. doi: 10.1177/1084713813495981.

14.

Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain.

Zakis JA, Fulton B, Steele BR.

Int J Audiol. 2012 Dec;51(12):906-13. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.701020. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

PMID:
23025794
15.

Music and hearing aids--an introduction.

Chasin M.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Sep;16(3):136-9. doi: 10.1177/1084713812468512.

16.

Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music.

Moore BC.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Sep;16(3):159-72. doi: 10.1177/1084713812465494. Epub 2012 Nov 19. Review.

17.

Unexpected intensity changes in the ear canal during a F(0)-shifted feedback experiment.

Tlumak AI, Szuminsky NJ, Shaiman S, Pratt SR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Nov;134(5):EL413-9. doi: 10.1121/1.4820461.

PMID:
24181984
18.

The effects of receiver placement on probe microphone, performance, and subjective measures with open canal hearing instruments.

Alworth LN, Plyler PN, Reber MB, Johnstone PM.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Apr;21(4):249-66. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.4.4.

PMID:
20388451
19.

Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.

Dawes P, Hopkins R, Munro KJ.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):472-7. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.783718. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

PMID:
23594421
20.

Acceptable noise level (ANL) and real-world hearing-aid success in Taiwanese listeners.

Ho HC, Wu YH, Hsiao SH, Zhang X.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Nov;52(11):762-70. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.815371.

PMID:
24099584
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk