Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 155

1.

Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ratib K, Mamas MA, Routledge HC, Ludman PF, Fraser D, Nolan J.

Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Dec 22.

PMID:
23453099
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?

Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, Neyses L, Fraser DG, de Belder M, Ludman PF, Nolan J; British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):698-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

PMID:
23769648
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).

Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, Baklanov DV, Kim LK, Wong SC, Minutello RM, Messenger JC, Moussa I, Garratt KN, Piana RN, Hillegass WB, Cohen MG, Gilchrist IC, Rao SV.

Circulation. 2013 Jun 11;127(23):2295-306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536.

PMID:
23753843
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

Access site-related complications after transradial catheterization can be reduced with smaller sheath size and statins.

Honda T, Fujimoto K, Miyao Y, Koga H, Hirata Y.

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2012 Sep;27(3):174-80. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

PMID:
22669817
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes after transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention.

Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Kadota K, Iwabuchi M, Shizuta S, Shiomi H, Kimura T.

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2012 May;27(2):84-92. doi: 10.1007/s12928-012-0098-z. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

PMID:
22623001
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: safe and effective with reduced hospital length of stay.

Bundhoo SS, Earp E, Ivanauskiene T, Kunadian V, Freeman P, Edwards R, Kinnaird TD, Zaman A, Anderson RA.

Am Heart J. 2012 Oct;164(4):468-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.029.

PMID:
23067903
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

The transradial versus the transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jang JS, Jin HY, Seo JS, Yang TH, Kim DK, Kim DK, Kim DI, Cho KI, Kim BH, Park YH, Je HG, Kim DS.

EuroIntervention. 2012 Aug;8(4):501-10. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I4A78. Review.

PMID:
22581470
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
8.

Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.

Amin AP, House JA, Safley DM, Chhatriwalla AK, Giersiefen H, Bremer A, Hamon M, Baklanov DV, Aluko A, Wohns D, Mathias DW, Applegate RA, Cohen DJ, Marso SP.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

PMID:
23871512
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
9.

Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database.

Safley DM, Amin AP, House JA, Baklanov D, Mills R, Giersiefen H, Bremer A, Marso SP.

Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):303-9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

PMID:
23453097
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.

Rodriguez-Leor O, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Carrillo X, Mauri J, Oliete C, Rivas Mdel C, Bayes-Genis A.

Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.011.

PMID:
23453093
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible?

Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Ratib K, Routledge H, Neyses L, Fraser DG, Buchan I, de Belder MA, Ludman P, Nolan J; British Cardiovascular Intervention Society; National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research.

Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):900-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

PMID:
24890541
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese.

Hibbert B, Simard T, Wilson KR, Hawken S, Wells GA, Ramirez FD, Le May MR, So DY, Glover CA, Froeschl M, Marquis JF, Labinaz M, Dick A, O'Brien ER.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug;5(8):819-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.009.

PMID:
22917453
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
13.

Risk-treatment paradox in the selection of transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Wimmer NJ, Resnic FS, Mauri L, Matheny ME, Piemonte TC, Pomerantsev E, Ho KK, Robbins SL, Waldman HM, Yeh RW.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 May 24;2(3):e000174. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000174.

PMID:
23709565
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Abdelaal E, Brousseau-Provencher C, Montminy S, Plourde G, MacHaalany J, Bataille Y, Molin P, Déry JP, Barbeau G, Roy L, Larose É, De Larochellière R, Nguyen CM, Proulx G, Costerousse O, Bertrand OF; Interventional Cardiologists at Quebec Heart-Lung Institute.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

PMID:
24139933
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry.

Romagnoli E, De Vita M, Burzotta F, Cortese B, Biondi-Zoccai G, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Lanzillo C, Lucci V, Cavazza C, Tarantino F, Sangiorgi GM, Lioy E, Crea F, Rao SV, Trani C.

Am Heart J. 2013 Dec;166(6):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

PMID:
24268216
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.

Dangoisse V, Guédès A, Gabriel L, Jamart J, Chenu P, Marchandise B, Schroeder E.

EuroIntervention. 2013 Jul;9(3):345-52. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I3A56.

PMID:
23872649
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
17.

Transitioning to the radial artery as the preferred access site for cardiac catheterization: an academic medical center experience.

Turner S, Sacrinty M, Manogue M, Little W, Gandhi S, Kutcher M, Santos R, Applegate R.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):247-57. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23387. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

PMID:
22162430
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Rapid cycle change to predominantly radial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: effect on vascular access site complications.

Nadarasa K, Robertson MC, Wong CK, Green BK, Chen VH, Wilkins GT, Williams MJ.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar 1;79(4):589-94. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23120. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

PMID:
21523899
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Outcome and safety of same-day-discharge percutaneous coronary interventions with femoral access: a single-center experience.

Antonsen L, Jensen LO, Thayssen P.

Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

PMID:
23453109
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Clinical investigation of transradial access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Qin X, Xiong W, Wang L, Guan E, Lu C.

Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1139-42. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S50939. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

PMID:
24039410
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk