Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

Imaging-Based Methods for Non-invasive Assessment of Bone Properties Influenced by Mechanical Loading.

Macintyre NJ, Lorbergs AL.

Physiother Can. 2012 Spring;64(2):202-15. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-08bh. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

PMID:
23449969
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
2.
3.

Recent progress in bone imaging for osteoporosis research.

Ito M.

J Bone Miner Metab. 2011 Mar;29(2):131-40. doi: 10.1007/s00774-010-0258-0. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

PMID:
21301898
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

The prospects of estimating trabecular bone tissue properties from the combination of ultrasound, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, microcomputed tomography, and microfinite element analysis.

van Lenthe GH, van den Bergh JP, Hermus AR, Huiskes R.

J Bone Miner Res. 2001 Mar;16(3):550-5.

PMID:
11277273
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Bone QUS measurement performed under loading condition, a more accuracy ultrasound method for osteoporosis diagnosis.

Liu C, Niu H, Fan Y, Li D.

Med Hypotheses. 2012 Oct;79(4):539-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

PMID:
22858357
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

How can we measure bone quality?

Hans D, Fuerst T, Lang T, Majumdar S, Lu Y, Genant HK, Glüer C.

Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1997 Aug;11(3):495-515. Review.

PMID:
9367034
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, Tomsick T, Connors B, Barr J, Dillon W, Warach S, Broderick J, Tilley B, Sacks D; Technology Assessment Committee of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. Epub 2003 Jul 17. Erratum in: Stroke. 2003 Nov;34(11):2774.

PMID:
12869717
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
8.

The influence of collagen fiber orientation and other histocompositional characteristics on the mechanical properties of equine cortical bone.

Skedros JG, Dayton MR, Sybrowsky CL, Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN.

J Exp Biol. 2006 Aug;209(Pt 15):3025-42.

PMID:
16857886
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
9.

Determinants of the mechanical properties of bones.

Martin RB.

J Biomech. 1991;24 Suppl 1:79-88. Review. Erratum in: J Biomech 1992 Oct;25(10):1251.

PMID:
1842337
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.
11.

Adaptive skeletal responses to mechanical loading during adolescence.

Greene DA, Naughton GA.

Sports Med. 2006;36(9):723-32. Review.

PMID:
16937949
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Additional weight bearing during exercise and estrogen in the rat: the effect on bone mass, turnover, and structure.

Tromp AM, Bravenboer N, Tanck E, Oostlander A, Holzmann PJ, Kostense PJ, Roos JC, Burger EH, Huiskes R, Lips P.

Calcif Tissue Int. 2006 Dec;79(6):404-15. Epub 2006 Dec 8.

PMID:
17160577
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Shortcomings of DXA to assess changes in bone tissue density and microstructure induced by metabolic bone diseases in rat models.

Nazarian A, Cory E, Müller R, Snyder BD.

Osteoporos Int. 2009 Jan;20(1):123-32. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0632-0. Epub 2008 May 31.

PMID:
18516487
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.

Pisharody S, Phillips R, Langton CM.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008 Apr;222(3):367-75.

PMID:
18491705
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

A new tool to assess the mechanical properties of bone due to collagen degradation.

Wynnyckyj C, Omelon S, Savage K, Damani M, Chachra D, Grynpas MD.

Bone. 2009 May;44(5):840-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.014. Epub 2008 Dec 25.

PMID:
19150659
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?

Hudelmaier M, Kuhn V, Lochmüller EM, Well H, Priemel M, Link TM, Eckstein F.

Osteoporos Int. 2004 May;15(5):375-81. Epub 2004 Jan 22.

PMID:
14740151
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Advanced CT bone imaging in osteoporosis.

Genant HK, Engelke K, Prevrhal S.

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Jul;47 Suppl 4:iv9-16. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken180. Review.

PMID:
18556648
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
18.

QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.

Dall'Ara E, Pahr D, Varga P, Kainberger F, Zysset P.

Osteoporos Int. 2012 Feb;23(2):563-72. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1568-3. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

PMID:
21344244
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Quantitative ultrasound methods to assess bone mineral status in children: technical characteristics, performance, and clinical application.

Baroncelli GI.

Pediatr Res. 2008 Mar;63(3):220-8. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318163a286. Review.

PMID:
18287958
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Evaluation of a pulsed phase-locked loop system for noninvasive tracking of bone deformation under loading with finite element and strain analysis.

Serra-Hsu F, Cheng J, Lynch T, Qin YX.

Physiol Meas. 2011 Aug;32(8):1301-13. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/32/8/019. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

PMID:
21765205
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk