Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Selection gradients, the opportunity for selection, and the coefficient of determination.

Moorad JA, Wade MJ.

Am Nat. 2013 Mar;181(3):291-300. doi: 10.1086/669158. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

2.

Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection.

Brooks R, Hunt J, Blows MW, Smith MJ, Bussière LF, Jennions MD.

Evolution. 2005 Apr;59(4):871-80.

PMID:
15926696
3.

How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Shuster SM, Briggs WR, Dennis PA.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 21;368(1613):20120046. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0046. Print 2013 Mar 5. Review.

4.
5.

Natural and sexual selection in a monogamous historical human population.

Courtiol A, Pettay JE, Jokela M, Rotkirch A, Lummaa V.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 22;109(21):8044-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118174109. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

6.
7.

Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection?

Kingsolver JG, Diamond SE.

Am Nat. 2011 Mar;177(3):346-57. doi: 10.1086/658341.

PMID:
21460543
8.

A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.

Long TA, Pischedda A, Stewart AD, Rice WR.

PLoS Biol. 2009 Dec;7(12):e1000254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000254. Epub 2009 Dec 8.

9.

Correlational selection leads to genetic integration of body size and an attractive plumage trait in dark-eyed juncos.

McGlothlin JW, Parker PG, Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED.

Evolution. 2005 Mar;59(3):658-71.

PMID:
15856707
10.

Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong?

Hereford J, Hansen TF, Houle D.

Evolution. 2004 Oct;58(10):2133-43.

PMID:
15562680
11.

Reduced genetic variance among high fitness individuals: inferring stabilizing selection on male sexual displays in Drosophila serrata.

Sztepanacz JL, Rundle HD.

Evolution. 2012 Oct;66(10):3101-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01658.x. Epub 2012 May 5.

PMID:
23025601
12.

Natural selection. II. Developmental variability and evolutionary rate.

Frank SA.

J Evol Biol. 2011 Nov;24(11):2310-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02373.x. Epub 2011 Sep 21. Review.

13.

The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Innocenti P, Morrow EH.

PLoS Biol. 2010 Mar 16;8(3):e1000335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000335.

14.

Mating advantage for rare males in wild guppy populations.

Hughes KA, Houde AE, Price AC, Rodd FH.

Nature. 2013 Nov 7;503(7474):108-10. doi: 10.1038/nature12717. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

PMID:
24172904
15.

Female mating preferences determine system-level evolution in a gene network model.

Fierst JL.

Genetica. 2013 Jun;141(4-6):157-70. doi: 10.1007/s10709-013-9714-9. Epub 2013 Apr 13.

PMID:
23584953
17.
18.

Joint phenotypes, evolutionary conflict and the fundamental theorem of natural selection.

Queller DC.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130423. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0423. Print 2014 May 19.

19.

The prediction of adaptive evolution: empirical application of the secondary theorem of selection and comparison to the breeder's equation.

Morrissey MB, Parker DJ, Korsten P, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LE, Wilson AJ.

Evolution. 2012 Aug;66(8):2399-410. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01632.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

PMID:
22834740
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk