Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 133

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23436865)

1.

Utility of preoperative ultrasound for predicting pN2 or higher stage axillary lymph node involvement in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Abe H, Schacht D, Sennett CA, Newstead GM, Schmidt RA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Mar;200(3):696-702. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9036.

PMID:
23436865
2.

Axillary ultrasound for preoperative nodal staging in breast cancer patients: is it of added value?

Schipper RJ, van Roozendaal LM, de Vries B, Pijnappel RM, Beets-Tan RG, Lobbes MB, Smidt ML.

Breast. 2013 Dec;22(6):1108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

PMID:
24095611
3.

[Preoperative staging of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: ultrasonographic parameters and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy].

Torres Sousa MY, Banegas Illescas ME, Rozas Rodríguez ML, Arias Ortega M, González López LM, Martín García JJ, Ruiz Ortega L.

Radiologia. 2011 Nov-Dec;53(6):544-51. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 May 11. Spanish.

4.

Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy--clinical experience in 100 patients.

Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Mueller JS, Newstead GM.

Radiology. 2009 Jan;250(1):41-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493071483. Epub 2008 Oct 27.

PMID:
18955508
5.

Role of axillary lymph node ultrasound and large core biopsy in the preoperative assessment of patients selected for sentinel node biopsy.

Nori J, Bazzocchi M, Boeri C, Vanzi E, Nori Bufalini F, Mangialavori G, Distante V, Masi A, Simoncini R, Londero V.

Radiol Med. 2005 Apr;109(4):330-44. English, Italian.

PMID:
15883518
6.

Axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration in the preoperative evaluation of the breast cancer patient: an algorithm based on tumor size and lymph node appearance.

Mainiero MB, Cinelli CM, Koelliker SL, Graves TA, Chung MA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Nov;195(5):1261-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4414.

PMID:
20966338
7.

False negative results of preoperative axillary ultrasound in patients with invasive breast cancer: correlations with clinicopathologic findings.

Choi JS, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Kim EK, Yoon JH.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Nov;38(11):1881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.07.011. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

PMID:
22975037
8.

The efficacy of axillary ultrasound in the detection of nodal metastasis in breast cancer.

Lee B, Lim AK, Krell J, Satchithananda K, Coombes RC, Lewis JS, Stebbing J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Mar;200(3):W314-20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9032.

PMID:
23436877
9.

Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. To do or not to do?

Leenders MW, Broeders M, Croese C, Richir MC, Go HL, Langenhorst BL, Meijer S, Schreurs WH.

Breast. 2012 Aug;21(4):578-83. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

PMID:
22717665
10.

Ultrasound elastography as an adjuvant to conventional ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of axillary lymph nodes in suspected breast cancer: a pilot study.

Taylor K, O'Keeffe S, Britton PD, Wallis MG, Treece GM, Housden J, Parashar D, Bond S, Sinnatamby R.

Clin Radiol. 2011 Nov;66(11):1064-71. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

PMID:
21835398
11.

Axillary ultrasound in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: which features are predictive of disease?

Elmore LC, Appleton CM, Zhou G, Margenthaler JA.

J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.068. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

PMID:
23664535
12.

The role of ultrasonography and FDG-PET in axillary lymph node staging of breast cancer.

Ahn JH, Son EJ, Kim JA, Youk JH, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Ryu YH, Jeong J.

Acta Radiol. 2010 Oct;51(8):859-65. doi: 10.3109/02841851.2010.501342.

PMID:
20670083
13.

Cortical morphologic features of axillary lymph nodes as a predictor of metastasis in breast cancer: in vitro sonographic study.

Bedi DG, Krishnamurthy R, Krishnamurthy S, Edeiken BS, Le-Petross H, Fornage BD, Bassett RL Jr, Hunt KK.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Sep;191(3):646-52. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2460.

PMID:
18716089
14.

Pretreatment axillary ultrasonography and core biopsy in patients with suspected breast cancer: diagnostic accuracy and impact on management.

Garcia-Ortega MJ, Benito MA, Vahamonde EF, Torres PR, Velasco AB, Paredes MM.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Jan 4.

PMID:
20047809
15.

Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.

Riegger C, Koeninger A, Hartung V, Otterbach F, Kimmig R, Forsting M, Bockisch A, Antoch G, Heusner TA.

Acta Radiol. 2012 Dec 1;53(10):1092-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.110635. Epub 2012 Sep 22.

PMID:
23002144
16.

Elastography in the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes prior to dissection.

Tourasse C, Dénier JF, Awada A, Gratadour AC, Nessah-Bousquet K, Gay J.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.031. Epub 2012 May 30.

PMID:
22656671
17.

The role of pre-operative B mode ultrasound in the evaluation of the axillary lymph node metastases in the initial staging of breast carcinoma.

Kebudi A, Calişkan C, Yetkin G, Celebi S, Işgör A, Mesrur Halefoğlu A, Ezdeşir R, Akgün I.

Acta Chir Belg. 2005 Sep-Oct;105(5):511-4.

PMID:
16315836
18.

Preoperative ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology for axillary staging in breast carcinoma.

Popli MB, Sahoo M, Mehrotra N, Choudhury M, Kumar A, Pathania OP, Thomas S.

Australas Radiol. 2006 Apr;50(2):122-6. Erratum in: Australas Radiol. 2006 Oct;50(5):512.

PMID:
16635029
19.

Is the clinically positive axilla in breast cancer really a contraindication to sentinel lymph node biopsy?

Specht MC, Fey JV, Borgen PI, Cody HS 3rd.

J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jan;200(1):10-4.

PMID:
15631914
20.

Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients.

Gipponi M, Bassetti C, Canavese G, Catturich A, Di Somma C, Vecchio C, Nicolò G, Schenone F, Tomei D, Cafiero F.

J Surg Oncol. 2004 Mar;85(3):102-11. Review.

PMID:
14991881
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk