Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Abdominal electromyography in laboring and non-laboring pregnant women at term and its clinical implications.

Kandil M, Emarh M, Ellakwa H.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Aug;288(2):293-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2757-4. Epub 2013 Feb 23.

PMID:
23435723
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Effect of stimulatory and inhibitory drugs on uterine electrical activity measured noninvasively from the abdominal surface of pregnant rats.

Buhimschi CS, Saade GR, Buhimschi IA, Gokdeniz R, Boyle MB, Garfield RE.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jul;183(1):68-75.

PMID:
10920311
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy.

Buhimschi C, Garfield RE.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;174(2):744-53.

PMID:
8623816
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Identification of human term and preterm labor using artificial neural networks on uterine electromyography data.

Maner WL, Garfield RE.

Ann Biomed Eng. 2007 Mar;35(3):465-73. Epub 2007 Jan 17.

PMID:
17226089
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat.

Buhimschi C, Boyle MB, Saade GR, Garfield RE.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Apr;178(4):811-22.

PMID:
9579450
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery.

Maul H, Maner WL, Olson G, Saade GR, Garfield RE.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 May;15(5):297-301.

PMID:
15280119
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients.

Garfield RE, Maner WL, MacKay LB, Schlembach D, Saade GR.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):23-9.

PMID:
16021054
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Abdominal electromyography may predict the response to tocolysis in preterm labor.

Kandil MA, Abdel-Sattar MM, Abdel-Salam SM, Saleh S, Khalafallah MM.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Jan;160(1):18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.09.035. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

PMID:
22019583
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Electrical activity of the human uterus during pregnancy as recorded from the abdominal surface.

Buhimschi C, Boyle MB, Garfield RE.

Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;90(1):102-11.

PMID:
9207823
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Systemic activation and vascular infiltration of neutrophils with term labor.

Leik CE, Walsh SW.

J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006 Sep;13(6):425-9.

PMID:
16945759
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy.

Kadanali S, Küçüközkan T, Zor N, Kumtepe Y.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996 Nov;55(2):99-104.

PMID:
8960988
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Effect of an oxytocin receptor antagonist (atosiban) on uterine electrical activity.

Hadar E, Melamed N, Aviram A, Raban O, Saltzer L, Hiersch L, Yogev Y.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):384.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.053. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

PMID:
23727522
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Comparison between amniotomy, oxytocin or both for augmentation of labor in prolonged latent phase: a randomized controlled trial.

Nachum Z, Garmi G, Kadan Y, Zafran N, Shalev E, Salim R.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Nov 7;8:136. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-136.

PMID:
21054896
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

Drugs and uterine motility.

Payton RG, Brucker MC.

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1999 Nov-Dec;28(6):628-38. Review. Erratum in: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2000 Jan-Feb;29(1):72.

PMID:
10584917
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Uterine contractility changes in the early puerperium.

Hendricks CH.

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1968 Mar;11(1):125-44. No abstract available.

PMID:
5653674
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.

Euliano TY, Nguyen MT, Darmanjian S, McGorray SP, Euliano N, Onkala A, Gregg AR.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):66.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.873. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

PMID:
23122926
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
17.

Contrasting effects of diethylenetriamine-nitric oxide, a spontaneously releasing nitric oxide donor, on pregnant rat uterine contractility in vitro versus in vivo.

Buhimschi C, Buhimschi I, Yallampalli C, Chwalisz K, Garfield RE.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;177(3):690-701.

PMID:
9322644
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Uterine contractility in women whose fetus is delivered in the occipitoposterior position.

Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Malinow AM, Weiner CP.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;188(3):734-9.

PMID:
12634649
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Electromyographic activity in cervices with very low Bishop score during labor.

Pajntar M, Verdenik I.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Jun;49(3):277-81.

PMID:
9764866
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

The effect of dystocia and previous cesarean uterine scar on the tensile properties of the lower uterine segment.

Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Yu C, Wang H, Sharer DJ, Diamond MP, Petkova AP, Garfield RE, Saade GR, Weiner CP.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):873-83.

PMID:
16522428
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk