Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 97

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23424284)

1.

Whole animal experiments should be more like human randomized controlled trials.

Muhlhausler BS, Bloomfield FH, Gillman MW.

PLoS Biol. 2013;11(2):e1001481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001481. Epub 2013 Feb 12. No abstract available.

2.

Animal experiments under fire for poor design.

Giles J.

Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):981. No abstract available.

PMID:
17183281
3.

The ARRIVE guidelines, a welcome improvement to standards for reporting animal research.

Danos O, Davies K, Lehn P, Mulligan R.

J Gene Med. 2010 Jul;12(7):559-60. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1472.

PMID:
20603891
4.

The '3Is' of animal experimentation.

[No authors listed]

Nat Genet. 2012 May 29;44(6):611. doi: 10.1038/ng.2322.

PMID:
22641201
5.

Improving the reporting of animal research: when will we ARRIVE?

Percie du Sert N.

Dis Model Mech. 2011 May;4(3):281-2. doi: 10.1242/dmm.007971. No abstract available.

6.

Reactivation of a suspended protocol.

[No authors listed]

Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Sep;41(9):249. doi: 10.1038/laban0912-249a. No abstract available.

PMID:
22914023
7.

Response. Do it by policy.

Jonnalagadda M, Ermel RW.

Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Sep;41(9):250. doi: 10.1038/laban0912-250a. No abstract available.

PMID:
22914025
8.

A word from OLAW and USDA.

Brown P, Gipson C.

Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Nov;41(11):308. doi: 10.1038/laban.185. No abstract available.

PMID:
23079911
9.

Response. Unnecessary delays!

Cox JD, George RA.

Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Nov;41(11):307. doi: 10.1038/laban.183. No abstract available.

PMID:
23079910
10.

Response. Amendment necessitates re-review.

Srivastava KK, Datiri BC.

Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Nov;41(11):308. doi: 10.1038/laban.184. No abstract available.

PMID:
23079912
11.

Response. A word from OLAW and USDA.

Brown P, Gipson C.

Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Sep;41(9):251. doi: 10.1038/laban0912-251. No abstract available.

PMID:
22914027
12.

Response. Appropriate reactivation process.

Datiri BC.

Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Sep;41(9):250-1. doi: 10.1038/laban0912-250b. No abstract available.

PMID:
22914026
13.

Response. Plan ahead for reactivation.

Theriault BR.

Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Sep;41(9):249-50. doi: 10.1038/laban0912-249b. No abstract available.

PMID:
22914024
14.

Amendment submitted; protocol reviewed?

[No authors listed]

Lab Anim (NY). 2012 Nov;41(11):307. doi: 10.1038/laban.159. No abstract available.

PMID:
23079909
15.

The need for littermate controls.

Holmdahl R, Malissen B.

Eur J Immunol. 2012 Jan;42(1):45-7. doi: 10.1002/eji.201142048.

PMID:
22213045
16.

A broader view of animal research.

Musch TI, Carroll RG, Just A, Lane PH, Talman WT.

BMJ. 2007 Feb 10;334(7588):274. No abstract available.

17.

Improving planning, design, reporting and scientific quality of animal experiments by using the Gold Standard Publication Checklist, in addition to the ARRIVE guidelines.

Hooijmans CR, de Vries R, Leenaars M, Curfs J, Ritskes-Hoitinga M.

Br J Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;162(6):1259-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01128.x.

18.

Systematic survey of the design, statistical analysis, and reporting of studies published in the 2008 volume of the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

Vesterinen HM, Egan K, Deister A, Schlattmann P, Macleod MR, Dirnagl U.

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011 Apr;31(4):1064-72. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.217. Epub 2010 Dec 15. Erratum in: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011 Apr;31(4):1171. Vesterinen, Hanna V [corrected to Vesterinen, Hanna M].

19.

Should clinicians care about preclinical animal research?

Silberberg SD.

Neurology. 2013 Mar 19;80(12):1072-3. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182886a51. No abstract available.

PMID:
23509045
20.

Which protocol deviations require preapproval? Is the deviation significant?

Fessaha N.

Lab Anim (NY). 2008 Jun;37(6):244. doi: 10.1038/laban0608-244a. No abstract available.

PMID:
18496540
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk