Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 156

1.

Aquatic biofouling prevention by electrically charged nanocomposite polymer thin film membranes.

de Lannoy CF, Jassby D, Gloe K, Gordon AD, Wiesner MR.

Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 19;47(6):2760-8. doi: 10.1021/es3045168. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

PMID:
23413920
2.

A new concept in polymeric thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes with antibacterial properties.

Mollahosseini A, Rahimpour A.

Biofouling. 2013;29(5):537-48. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2013.777953. Epub 2013 May 17.

PMID:
23682668
3.

Biogenic silver nanoparticles (bio-Ag 0) decrease biofouling of bio-Ag 0/PES nanocomposite membranes.

Zhang M, Zhang K, De Gusseme B, Verstraete W.

Water Res. 2012 May 1;46(7):2077-87. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

PMID:
22330259
4.

Improved antifouling properties of polyamide nanofiltration membranes by reducing the density of surface carboxyl groups.

Mo Y, Tiraferri A, Yip NY, Adout A, Huang X, Elimelech M.

Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Dec 18;46(24):13253-61. doi: 10.1021/es303673p. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

PMID:
23205860
5.

Impact of higher alginate expression on deposition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in radial stagnation point flow and reverse osmosis systems.

Herzberg M, Rezene TZ, Ziemba C, Gillor O, Mathee K.

Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Oct 1;43(19):7376-83.

PMID:
19848149
6.

Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.

Khan MM, Stewart PS, Moll DJ, Mickols WE, Nelson SE, Camper AK.

Biofouling. 2011 Feb;27(2):173-83. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2010.551766.

PMID:
21253926
7.

Influence of zeolite crystal size on zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes.

Lind ML, Ghosh AK, Jawor A, Huang X, Hou W, Yang Y, Hoek EM.

Langmuir. 2009 Sep 1;25(17):10139-45. doi: 10.1021/la900938x.

PMID:
19527039
8.

Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.

Mun S, Baek Y, Kim C, Lee YW, Yoon J.

Biofouling. 2012;28(6):627-33. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2012.700051.

PMID:
22726211
9.

In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.

Dreszer C, Wexler AD, Drusová S, Overdijk T, Zwijnenburg A, Flemming HC, Kruithof JC, Vrouwenvelder JS.

Water Res. 2014 Dec 15;67:243-54. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

PMID:
25282092
10.

Tailoring the structure of thin film nanocomposite membranes to achieve seawater RO membrane performance.

Lind ML, Eumine Suk D, Nguyen TV, Hoek EM.

Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;44(21):8230-5. doi: 10.1021/es101569p.

PMID:
20942398
11.

Short-term adhesion and long-term biofouling testing of polydopamine and poly(ethylene glycol) surface modifications of membranes and feed spacers for biofouling control.

Miller DJ, Araújo PA, Correia PB, Ramsey MM, Kruithof JC, van Loosdrecht MC, Freeman BD, Paul DR, Whiteley M, Vrouwenvelder JS.

Water Res. 2012 Aug;46(12):3737-53. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.058. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

PMID:
22578432
12.

A physical impact of organic fouling layers on bacterial adhesion during nanofiltration.

Heffernan R, Habimana O, Semião AJ, Cao H, Safari A, Casey E.

Water Res. 2014 Dec 15;67:118-28. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Sep 17. Erratum in: Water Res. 2015 Oct 15;83():412-3.

PMID:
25265304
13.

Appreciating the role of carbon nanotube composites in preventing biofouling and promoting biofilms on material surfaces in environmental engineering: a review.

Upadhyayula VK, Gadhamshetty V.

Biotechnol Adv. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):802-16. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 3. Review.

PMID:
20599491
14.

Zwitterion functionalized carbon nanotube/polyamide nanocomposite membranes for water desalination.

Chan WF, Chen HY, Surapathi A, Taylor MG, Shao X, Marand E, Johnson JK.

ACS Nano. 2013 Jun 25;7(6):5308-19. doi: 10.1021/nn4011494. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

PMID:
23705642
15.

A novel positively charged membrane based on polyamide thin-film composite made by cross-linking for nanofiltration.

Akbari A, Fakharshakeri Z, Mojallali Rostami SM.

Water Sci Technol. 2016;73(4):776-89. doi: 10.2166/wst.2015.538.

PMID:
26901720
16.

Electrically conductive polymeric materials with high stretchability and excellent elasticity by a surface coating method.

Li Y, Zhao L, Shimizu H.

Macromol Rapid Commun. 2011 Feb 2;32(3):289-94. doi: 10.1002/marc.201000470. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

PMID:
21433173
17.

Influence of membrane surface properties on the behavior of initial bacterial adhesion and biofilm development onto nanofiltration membranes.

Myint AA, Lee W, Mun S, Ahn CH, Lee S, Yoon J.

Biofouling. 2010;26(3):313-21. doi: 10.1080/08927010903576389.

PMID:
20087803
18.

Use of rhamnolipid biosurfactant for membrane biofouling prevention and cleaning.

Kim LH, Jung Y, Kim SJ, Kim CM, Yu HW, Park HD, Kim IS.

Biofouling. 2015;31(2):211-20. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2015.1022724.

PMID:
25789851
19.

High-Flux Positively Charged Nanocomposite Nanofiltration Membranes Filled with Poly(dopamine) Modified Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes.

Zhao FY, Ji YL, Weng XD, Mi YF, Ye CC, An QF, Gao CJ.

ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016 Mar;8(10):6693-700. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00394. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

PMID:
26901491
20.

A review on polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes: History, applications, challenges and approaches.

Lau WJ, Gray S, Matsuura T, Emadzadeh D, Chen JP, Ismail AF.

Water Res. 2015 Sep 1;80:306-24. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.037. Epub 2015 May 6. Review.

PMID:
26011136
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk