Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

Effects on cervical cytology screening productivity associated with implementation of the BD FocalPointâ„¢ Guided Screener Imaging System.

Sweeney BJ, Wilbur DC.

Acta Cytol. 2013;57(2):147-52. doi: 10.1159/000345569. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

PMID:
23406848
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

MAVARIC - a comparison of automation-assisted and manual cervical screening: a randomised controlled trial.

Kitchener HC, Blanks R, Cubie H, Desai M, Dunn G, Legood R, Gray A, Sadique Z, Moss S; MAVARIC Trial Study Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(3):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-170. doi: 10.3310/hta15030.

PMID:
21266159
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.

Lee JS, Kuan L, Oh S, Patten FW, Wilbur DC.

Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):221-6.

PMID:
9479344
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.

Austin RM, Ramzy I.

Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):178-84.

PMID:
9479337
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

The positive impact of simultaneous implementation of the BD FocalPoint GS Imaging System and lean principles on the operation of gynecologic cytology.

Wong R, Levi AW, Harigopal M, Schofield K, Chhieng DC.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Feb;136(2):183-9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0139-OA.

PMID:
22288966
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.

Mitchell H, Medley G.

Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):260-4.

PMID:
9479349
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Increasing cytotechnologist workload above 100 slides per day using the BD FocalPoint GS imaging system negatively affects screening performance.

Levi AW, Galullo P, Gordy K, Mikolaiski N, Schofield K, Elsheikh TM, Harigopal M, Chhieng DC.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Dec;138(6):811-5. doi: 10.1309/AJCPTYDD9G2NCUMF.

PMID:
23161714
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
8.

Using the Pathfinder system to reduce missed abnormal cervical cytologic smear cases in a rescreening program.

Berger BM.

Acta Cytol. 1997 Jan-Feb;41(1):173-81.

PMID:
9022741
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs. manual screen of cervical liquid-based cytology slides.

Pacheco MC, Conley RC, Pennington DW, Bishop JW.

Acta Cytol. 2008 Sep-Oct;52(5):575-8.

PMID:
18833820
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost.

Kaminsky FC, Benneyan JC, Mullins DL.

Acta Cytol. 1997 Jan-Feb;41(1):209-23. Review.

PMID:
9022745
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.

Williamson SL, Hair T, Wadehra V.

Cytopathology. 1997 Jun;8(3):188-95.

PMID:
9202894
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Impact of the Pathfinder in a cytology laboratory.

Coggi G, Bulfamante G, Romeo M, Falleni M, Aldovini A, Cirillo G, Federico D, Roncalli M.

Acta Cytol. 1997 Jan-Feb;41(1):166-72.

PMID:
9022740
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

AutoPap 300 QC system scoring of cervical smears without "epithelial cell abnormalities".

Colgan TJ, Bon N, Lee JS, Patten SF Jr.

Acta Cytol. 1997 Jan-Feb;41(1):45-9.

PMID:
9022725
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System in the detection of abnormal cervicovaginal cytology: a practical experience in Korea.

Ha SY, Lee YK, Oh YL.

Acta Cytol. 2013;57(2):159-63. doi: 10.1159/000345103. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

PMID:
23406895
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Impact of automated technology on the cervical cytologic smear. A comparison of cost.

Grohs DH.

Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):165-70. Review.

PMID:
9479335
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET cytologic screening system.

Mitchell H, Medley G.

Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):265-70.

PMID:
9479350
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Temporal characteristics of laboratory screening errors in cervical cytology.

Mitchell H, Hocking J, Saville M.

Acta Cytol. 2006 Sep-Oct;50(5):492-8.

PMID:
17017433
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.

Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ.

Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):214-20.

PMID:
9479343
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.

Mango LJ, Valente PT.

Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):227-32.

PMID:
9479345
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

[Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology].

Ikenberg H.

Pathologe. 2011 Nov;32(6):476-83. doi: 10.1007/s00292-011-1477-4. Review. German.

PMID:
22038134
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk