Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 88

1.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in diabetic patients with infra-genicular peripheral arterial disease: systematic review.

Healy DA, Boyle EM, Clarke Moloney M, Hodnett PA, Scanlon T, Grace PA, Walsh SR.

Int J Surg. 2013;11(3):228-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 9. Review.

2.

Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography with additional steady-state acquisition of the infragenicular arteries in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Nielsen YW, Eiberg JP, Løgager VB, Just S, Schroeder TV, Thomsen HS.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):484-91. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9759-4. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

PMID:
19957180
3.

Meta-analysis: Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease.

Menke J, Larsen J.

Ann Intern Med. 2010 Sep 7;153(5):325-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-5-201009070-00007. Review.

PMID:
20820041
4.

A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease.

Collins R, Cranny G, Burch J, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Craig D, Wright K, Berry E, Gough M, Kleijnen J, Westwood M.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 May;11(20):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-184. Review.

5.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.

Bui BT, Miller S, Mildenberger P, Sam A 2nd, Sheng R; Omniscan MRA Investigator Panel.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jun;31(6):1402-10. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22086.

PMID:
20512893
6.

Accuracy of semiautomated analysis of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detection and quantification of aortoiliac stenoses.

de Vries M, de Koning PJ, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Planken RN, Vasbinder GB, van Engelshoven JM, van der Geest RJ, Leiner T.

Invest Radiol. 2005 Aug;40(8):495-503.

PMID:
16024987
7.

Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Berg F, Bangard C, Bovenschulte H, Hellmich M, Nijenhuis M, Lackner K, Gossmann A.

Invest Radiol. 2008 Sep;43(9):642-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e90ba.

PMID:
18708858
8.

Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.

Huegli RW, Aschwanden M, Kos S, Rasmus M, Jaeger K, Jacob AL, Bilecen D.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Dec;49(10):1129-36. doi: 10.1080/02841850802508942.

PMID:
19031180
9.

MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.

Kreitner KF, Kunz RP, Herber S, Martenstein S, Dorweiler B, Dueber C.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jan;27(1):78-85.

PMID:
18058929
10.
11.
12.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography MoBI-trak in the study of peripheral vascular disease.

Carriero A, Maggialetti A, Pinto D, Salcuni M, Mansour M, Petronelli S, Bonomo L.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002 Jan-Feb;25(1):42-7. Epub 2002 Jan 9.

PMID:
11907773
13.

Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.

Doelman C, Duijm LE, Liem YS, Froger CL, Tielbeek AV, Donkers-van Rossum AB, Cuypers PW, Douwes-Draaijer P, Buth J, van den Bosch HC.

J Vasc Surg. 2005 Oct;42(4):739-46.

15.

Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple stations: feasibility study.

de Vries M, Nijenhuis RJ, Hoogeveen RM, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM, Leiner T.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jan;21(1):37-45.

PMID:
15611941
16.

Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.

Mell M, Tefera G, Thornton F, Siepman D, Turnipseed W.

J Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;45(3):543-8; discussion 548. Epub 2007 Jan 16.

17.

Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography.

Cronberg CN, Sjöberg S, Albrechtsson U, Leander P, Lindh M, Norgren L, Danielsson P, Sonesson B, Larsson EM.

Acta Radiol. 2003 Jan;44(1):59-66.

PMID:
12631001
18.

Diagnosis of systemic arterial diseases with whole-body 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

Lin J, Chen B, Wang JH.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Nov 5;119(21):1772-8.

PMID:
17097030
19.

Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.

Deutschmann HA, Schoellnast H, Portugaller HR, Preidler KW, Reittner P, Tillich M, Pilger E, Szolar DH.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 Sep-Oct;29(5):762-70.

PMID:
16625410
20.

Contrast material-enhanced, moving-table MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts.

Loewe C, Cejna M, Schoder M, Loewe-Grgurin M, Wolf F, Lammer J, Thurnher SA.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Pt 1):1129-37.

PMID:
14514804
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk