Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 126

1.

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.

Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, van der Windt DA, Hayden JA, Perel P, Schroter S, Riley RD, Hemingway H, Altman DG; PROGRESS Group.

PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Review.

2.

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research.

Riley RD, Hayden JA, Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, Abrams K, Kyzas PA, Malats N, Briggs A, Schroter S, Altman DG, Hemingway H; PROGRESS Group.

PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001380. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Review.

3.

Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: stratified medicine research.

Hingorani AD, Windt DA, Riley RD, Abrams K, Moons KG, Steyerberg EW, Schroter S, Sauerbrei W, Altman DG, Hemingway H; PROGRESS Group.

BMJ. 2013 Feb 5;346:e5793. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5793. No abstract available.

4.

Various randomized designs can be used to evaluate medical tests.

Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):364-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.017. Epub 2008 Oct 21.

PMID:
18945590
5.

Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: a framework for researching clinical outcomes.

Hemingway H, Croft P, Perel P, Hayden JA, Abrams K, Timmis A, Briggs A, Udumyan R, Moons KG, Steyerberg EW, Roberts I, Schroter S, Altman DG, Riley RD; PROGRESS Group.

BMJ. 2013 Feb 5;346:e5595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5595. No abstract available.

6.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

7.

Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker.

Moons KG, Kengne AP, Woodward M, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Altman DG, Grobbee DE.

Heart. 2012 May;98(9):683-90. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301246. Epub 2012 Mar 7. Review.

PMID:
22397945
8.

Establishing prognosis in heart failure: a multimarker approach.

Ketchum ES, Levy WC.

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Sep-Oct;54(2):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2011.03.003. Review.

PMID:
21875508
9.

Comparative effectiveness research in oncology: the need for clarity, transparency and vision.

Lyman GH.

Cancer Invest. 2009 Jul;27(6):593-7. doi: 10.1080/07357900903109952. No abstract available.

PMID:
19557579
10.

Re: Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: a new approach based on risk prediction.

Simon RM, Freidlin B.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Mar 2;103(5):445; author reply 445-6, discussion 446. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq552. Epub 2011 Jan 12. No abstract available.

11.

On framing the research question and choosing the appropriate research design.

Parfrey P, Ravani P.

Methods Mol Biol. 2009;473:1-17. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-385-1_1. Review.

PMID:
19160729
12.

Approaches to predictive modeling.

Steen PM.

Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Dec;58(6):1836-40.

PMID:
7979778
13.

Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).

Brettschneider C, Lühmann D, Raspe H.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000092.

14.
15.

Introduction to the findings of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis: what is a prognostic study?

Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Holm L, Cancelliere C, Côté P, Borg J.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.026.

PMID:
24581916
16.

Designing, conducting and reporting clinical research. A step by step approach.

Hanson BP.

Injury. 2006 Jul;37(7):583-94. Epub 2005 Aug 25. Review.

PMID:
16125705
17.

Clinical prediction rules.

Maher C.

Phys Ther. 2006 May;86(5):759; author reply 760. No abstract available.

18.

Use of classical and novel biomarkers as prognostic risk factors for localised prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Sutcliffe P, Hummel S, Simpson E, Young T, Rees A, Wilkinson A, Hamdy F, Clarke N, Staffurth J.

Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jan;13(5):iii, xi-xiii 1-219. doi: 10.3310/hta13050. Review.

19.

Promoting publication of rigorous qualitative research.

Krumholz HM, Bradley EH, Curry LA.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Mar 1;6(2):133-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000186. Epub 2013 Mar 12. No abstract available.

20.

Inherent problems with randomized clinical trials with observational/no treatment arms.

Buckley CJ, Rutherford RB, Diethrich EB, Buckley SD.

J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jul;52(1):237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.255.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk