Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 102

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23386501)

1.

When peers are not peers and don't know it: The Dunning-Kruger effect and self-fulfilling prophecy in peer-review.

Huang S.

Bioessays. 2013 May;35(5):414-6. doi: 10.1002/bies.201200182. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

PMID:
23386501
2.

How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper.

Kumar PD.

J Assoc Physicians India. 1999 Feb;47(2):198-200.

PMID:
10999090
3.

"Why do (don't) you ask?" Transference and the desire (not) to know.

Friedlander SR.

Am J Psychoanal. 1991 Jun;51(2):117-35; discussion 137-44.

PMID:
1928514
4.

Healthcare system intervention for prevention of birth injuries - process evaluation of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and agreement for change.

Nyström ME, Westerlund A, Höög E, Millde-Luthander C, Högberg U, Grunewald C.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 24;12:274. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-274.

5.

Unskilled and optimistic: overconfident predictions despite calibrated knowledge of relative skill.

Simons DJ.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):601-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0379-2.

PMID:
23345139
6.

[The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elite" reviewers].

Alfonso F.

Neurologia. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(9):521-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Oct 28. Spanish.

7.

Self- and peer assessment in a first-year communication and interviewing course.

Rudy DW, Fejfar MC, Griffith CH 3rd, Wilson JF.

Eval Health Prof. 2001 Dec;24(4):436-45.

PMID:
11817201
8.

Children's reasoning about evaluative feedback.

Heyman GD, Fu G, Sweet MA, Lee K.

Br J Dev Psychol. 2009 Nov;27(Pt 4):875-90.

PMID:
19994484
9.

Recalled peer relationship experiences and current levels of self-criticism and self-reassurance.

Kopala-Sibley DC, Zuroff DC, Leybman MJ, Hope N.

Psychol Psychother. 2013 Mar;86(1):33-51. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.2011.02044.x. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

PMID:
23386554
10.

Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning.

Violato C, Lockyer J.

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006 Aug;11(3):235-44.

PMID:
16832707
11.

Peer review: self help for occupational health nurses.

McLain EH.

AAOHN J. 1990 Mar;38(3):110-3.

PMID:
2317237
12.

Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?

Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, Gerrity M, Byrne C, Tierney WM.

PLoS One. 2010 Apr 8;5(4):e10072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010072.

13.

An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials.

Papinczak T, Young L, Groves M, Haynes M.

Med Teach. 2007 Jun;29(5):e122-32.

PMID:
17885964
14.

The outcast-lash-out effect in youth: alienation increases aggression following peer rejection.

Reijntjes A, Thomaes S, Bushman BJ, Boelen PA, de Castro BO, Telch MJ.

Psychol Sci. 2010 Oct;21(10):1394-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797610381509. Epub 2010 Aug 25.

PMID:
20739674
15.

The use of objective structured self-assessment and peer-feedback (OSSP) for learning communication skills: evaluation using a controlled trial.

Perera J, Mohamadou G, Kaur S.

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 May;15(2):185-93. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9191-1. Epub 2009 Sep 15.

PMID:
19757129
16.

Getting 360 degrees feedback right.

Peiperl MA.

Harv Bus Rev. 2001 Jan;79(1):142-7, 177.

PMID:
11189458
17.

[Agreement and differences between reviewers in a peer review procedure].

Maier-Riehle B, Gerdes N, Protz W, Jäckel WH.

Gesundheitswesen. 1998 May;60(5):290-6. German.

PMID:
9676010
18.

Peer review of the biomedical literature.

Olson CM.

Am J Emerg Med. 1990 Jul;8(4):356-8. Review.

PMID:
2194471
19.

Making a theory useful: lessons handed down.

Higgins ET.

Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(2):138-45.

PMID:
15223513
20.
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk