Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 192

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23368708)

1.

Does life history shape sexual size dimorphism in anurans? A comparative analysis.

Han X, Fu J.

BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Jan 31;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-27.

2.

Can sexual selection drive female life histories? A comparative study on Galliform birds.

Kolm N, Stein RW, Mooers AØ, Verspoor JJ, Cunningham EJ.

J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):627-38.

PMID:
17305829
3.

Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch's rule.

Liao WB, Zeng Y, Zhou CQ, Jehle R.

Front Zool. 2013 Mar 9;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-10.

4.

Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.

Lislevand T, Figuerola J, Székely T.

J Evol Biol. 2009 Sep;22(9):1895-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01802.x. Epub 2009 Aug 3.

PMID:
19682306
5.

Sexual size dimorphism in caecilian amphibians: analysis, review and directions for future research.

Kupfer A.

Zoology (Jena). 2009;112(5):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 May 9. Review.

PMID:
19433349
6.

A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards.

Cox RM, Skelly SL, John-Alder HB.

Evolution. 2003 Jul;57(7):1653-69.

PMID:
12940368
7.

Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch's rule in Odonata.

Serrano-Meneses MA, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Azpilicueta-Amorín M, González-Soriano E, Székely T.

J Evol Biol. 2008 Sep;21(5):1259-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01567.x. Epub 2008 Jul 11.

PMID:
18636976
8.

Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.

Herczeg G, Gonda A, Merilä J.

J Anim Ecol. 2010 May;79(3):581-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01665.x. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

PMID:
20202005
9.

Alternative mating strategies and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana: a population-level comparative analysis.

Corl A, Davis AR, Kuchta SR, Comendant T, Sinervo B.

Evolution. 2010 Jan;64(1):79-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00791.x. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

PMID:
19659598
10.
11.

A test of Rensch's rule in greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) with female-biased sexual size dimorphism.

Wu H, Jiang T, Huang X, Lin H, Wang H, Wang L, Niu H, Feng J.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e86085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086085. eCollection 2014.

12.

The evolution of fecundity is associated with female body size but not female-biased sexual size dimorphism among frogs.

Monroe MJ, South SH, Alonzo SH.

J Evol Biol. 2015 Jul 18. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12695. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
26189727
13.

Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence.

Stephens PR, Wiens JJ.

Evolution. 2009 Apr;63(4):910-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00597.x. Epub 2009 Jan 2.

PMID:
19210531
14.

Ecological divergence and sexual selection drive sexual size dimorphism in New World pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae).

Hendry CR, Guiher TJ, Pyron RA.

J Evol Biol. 2014 Apr;27(4):760-71. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12349. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

PMID:
24597708
15.

Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders.

Cheng RC, Kuntner M.

Evolution. 2014 Oct;68(10):2861-72. doi: 10.1111/evo.12504. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

PMID:
25130435
16.

Correlated evolution of allometry and sexual dimorphism across higher taxa.

De Lisle SP, Rowe L.

Am Nat. 2013 Nov;182(5):630-9. doi: 10.1086/673282. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

PMID:
24107370
17.

Parental care trade-offs and life-history relationships in insects.

Gilbert JD, Manica A.

Am Nat. 2010 Aug;176(2):212-26. doi: 10.1086/653661.

PMID:
20528469
18.
19.

Sexual size dimorphism in a Drosophila clade, the D. obscura group.

Huey RB, Moreteau B, Moreteau JC, Gibert P, Gilchrist GW, Ives AR, Garland T Jr, David JR.

Zoology (Jena). 2006;109(4):318-30. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

PMID:
16978850
20.

Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism.

Corcobado G, Rodríguez-Gironés MA, De Mas E, Moya-Laraño J.

BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Aug 3;10:236. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-236.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk