Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Spring constant of a tuning-fork sensor for dynamic force microscopy.

van Vörden D, Lange M, Schmuck M, Schmidt N, Möller R.

Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2012;3:809-16. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.3.90. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

PMID:
23365793
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
2.

Calibration of quartz tuning fork spring constants for non-contact atomic force microscopy: direct mechanical measurements and simulations.

Falter J, Stiefermann M, Langewisch G, Schurig P, Hölscher H, Fuchs H, Schirmeisen A.

Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2014 Apr 23;5:507-16. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.5.59. eCollection 2014.

PMID:
24778977
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
3.

Effective stiffness of qPlus sensor and quartz tuning fork.

Kim J, Won D, Sung B, An S, Jhe W.

Ultramicroscopy. 2014 Jun;141:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

PMID:
24727200
[PubMed - in process]
4.

Force-gradient-induced mechanical dissipation of quartz tuning fork force sensors used in atomic force microscopy.

Castellanos-Gomez A, Agraït N, Rubio-Bollinger G.

Ultramicroscopy. 2011 Feb;111(3):186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.032. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

PMID:
21333855
[PubMed]
5.

Influence of Poisson's ratio variation on lateral spring constant of atomic force microscopy cantilevers.

Yeh MK, Tai NH, Chen BY.

Ultramicroscopy. 2008 Sep;108(10):1025-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 May 7.

PMID:
18547729
[PubMed]
6.

Mechanically stable tuning fork sensor with high quality factor for the atomic force microscope.

Kim K, Park JY, Kim KB, Lee N, Seo Y.

Scanning. 2014 Nov;36(6):632-9. doi: 10.1002/sca.21169. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

PMID:
25229367
[PubMed - in process]
7.

Development of a quartz tuning-fork-based force sensor for measurements in the tens of nanoNewton force range during nanomanipulation experiments.

Oiko VT, Martins BV, Silva PC, Rodrigues V, Ugarte D.

Rev Sci Instrum. 2014 Mar;85(3):035003. doi: 10.1063/1.4868236.

PMID:
24689612
[PubMed - in process]
8.

Dynamics of quartz tuning fork force sensors used in scanning probe microscopy.

Castellanos-Gomez A, Agraït N, Rubio-Bollinger G.

Nanotechnology. 2009 May 27;20(21):215502. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/21/215502. Epub 2009 May 5.

PMID:
19423931
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Finite element analysis of electrically excited quartz tuning fork devices.

Oria R, Otero J, González L, Botaya L, Carmona M, Puig-Vidal M.

Sensors (Basel). 2013 May 30;13(6):7156-69. doi: 10.3390/s130607156.

PMID:
23722828
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
10.

Calculation of the effect of tip geometry on noncontact atomic force microscopy using a qPlus sensor.

Stirling J, Shaw GA.

Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2013;4:10-9. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.4.2. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

PMID:
23400392
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
11.

Simultaneous current, force and dissipation measurements on the Si(111) 7×7 surface with an optimized qPlus AFM/STM technique.

Majzik Z, Setvín M, Bettac A, Feltz A, Cháb V, Jelínek P.

Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2012;3:249-59. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.3.28. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

PMID:
22496998
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
12.

QPlus: atomic force microscopy on single-crystal insulators with small oscillation amplitudes at 5 K.

Bettac A, Koeble J, Winkler K, Uder B, Maier M, Feltz A.

Nanotechnology. 2009 Jul 1;20(26):264009. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/26/264009. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

PMID:
19509448
[PubMed]
13.

Calibration of the spring constant of cantilevers of arbitrary shape using the phase signal in an atomic force microscope.

Rawlings C, Durkan C.

Nanotechnology. 2012 Dec 7;23(48):485708. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/48/485708. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

PMID:
23137943
[PubMed]
14.

Accuracy of the spring constant of atomic force microscopy cantilevers by finite element method.

Chen BY, Yeh MK, Tai NH.

Anal Chem. 2007 Feb 15;79(4):1333-8.

PMID:
17297931
[PubMed]
15.

A simple and accurate method for calibrating the oscillation amplitude of tuning-fork based AFM sensors.

Liu J, Callegari A, Stark M, Chergui M.

Ultramicroscopy. 2008 Dec;109(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Sep 19.

PMID:
18947925
[PubMed]
16.

Spring constant calibration of atomic force microscopy cantilevers with a piezosensor transfer standard.

Langlois ED, Shaw GA, Kramar JA, Pratt JR, Hurley DC.

Rev Sci Instrum. 2007 Sep;78(9):093705.

PMID:
17902953
[PubMed]
17.

Atomic force microscope cantilever spring constant evaluation for higher mode oscillations: a kinetostatic method.

Tseytlin YM.

Rev Sci Instrum. 2008 Feb;79(2 Pt 1):025102. doi: 10.1063/1.2839019. Erratum in: Rev Sci Instrum. 2008 May;79(5):059901.

PMID:
18315324
[PubMed]
18.

Quartz tuning fork biosensor.

Su X, Dai C, Zhang J, O'Shea SJ.

Biosens Bioelectron. 2002 Jan;17(1-2):111-7.

PMID:
11742742
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Effects of anisotropic material property on the spring constant and the resonant frequency of atomic force microscope cantilever.

Yeh MK, Tai NH, Chen BY.

Rev Sci Instrum. 2009 Apr;80(4):043705. doi: 10.1063/1.3115212.

PMID:
19405664
[PubMed]
20.

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk