Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 194

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23351572)

1.

Videolaryngoscopy with glidescope reduces cervical spine movement in patients with unsecured cervical spine.

Kill C, Risse J, Wallot P, Seidl P, Steinfeldt T, Wulf H.

J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.080. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

PMID:
23351572
2.
3.

Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.

Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jan;27(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832d328d.

PMID:
19809328
4.

Tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a randomized trial of the Airway Scope and the GlideScope.

Liu EH, Goy RW, Tan BH, Asai T.

Br J Anaesth. 2009 Sep;103(3):446-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep164. Epub 2009 Jun 19.

5.

A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.

van Zundert A, Maassen R, Lee R, Willems R, Timmerman M, Siemonsma M, Buise M, Wiepking M.

Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):825-31. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae39db.

PMID:
19690253
6.

Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial.

Wetsch WA, Spelten O, Hellmich M, Carlitscheck M, Padosch SA, Lier H, Böttiger BW, Hinkelbein J.

Resuscitation. 2012 Jun;83(6):740-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.024. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

PMID:
22155448
7.

Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study.

Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Hara K.

Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):563-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen207. Epub 2008 Jul 25.

8.

Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with the Bullard, Macintosh, and Miller laryngoscopes.

Hastings RH, Vigil AC, Hanna R, Yang BY, Sartoris DJ.

Anesthesiology. 1995 Apr;82(4):859-69.

PMID:
7717556
9.

Distortion of anterior airway anatomy during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope.

Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H.

J Anesth. 2010 Jun;24(3):366-72. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0927-0. Epub 2010 Apr 6.

PMID:
20364439
10.

Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope videolaryngoscopy.

Robitaille A, Williams SR, Tremblay MH, Guilbert F, Thériault M, Drolet P.

Anesth Analg. 2008 Mar;106(3):935-41, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318161769e.

PMID:
18292443
11.

A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes.

Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H.

Anaesthesia. 2008 Jun;63(6):635-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05480.x.

PMID:
18477276
12.

Comparison of the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation.

Hsu HT, Chou SH, Wu PJ, Tseng KY, Kuo YW, Chou CY, Cheng KI.

Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr;67(4):411-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07049.x. Epub 2012 Feb 11.

PMID:
22324297
13.

A randomized comparison of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope to the standard laryngoscopy for intubation by pediatric residents in simulated easy and difficult infant airway scenarios.

Fonte M, Oulego-Erroz I, Nadkarni L, Sánchez-Santos L, Iglesias-Vásquez A, Rodríguez-Núñez A.

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 May;27(5):398-402. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318217b550.

PMID:
21494161
14.

Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy.

Russell T, Khan S, Elman J, Katznelson R, Cooper RM.

Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):626-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07087.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

PMID:
22352799
15.

Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways.

Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, Dörges V, Cavus E.

Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Feb;79(2):121-9. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

PMID:
23032922
16.

Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation with Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.

Hindman BJ, Santoni BG, Puttlitz CM, From RP, Todd MM.

Anesthesiology. 2014 Aug;121(2):260-71. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000263.

PMID:
24739996
17.

Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope.

Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW.

Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):910-5, table of contents. Erratum in: Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):1011.

PMID:
16116013
18.

[A comparison of Airtraq™ laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy in adult patients with immobilized cervical spine].

Amor M, Nabil S, Bensghir M, Moussaoui A, Kabbaj S, Kamili ND, Maazouzi W.

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013 May;32(5):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Apr 3. French.

PMID:
23561715
19.

Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope.

Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Kamata T, Yokochi M, Hara K.

Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):120-4.

20.

Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H.

Anaesthesia. 2007 Oct;62(10):1050-5.

PMID:
17845658
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk