Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 334

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23324923)

1.

Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.

Modhia U, Takemoto S, Braid-Forbes MJ, Weber M, Berven SH.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):591-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828628f5.

PMID:
23324923
2.

Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention.

Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, Aaronson O, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Feb;16(2):135-40. doi: 10.3171/2011.9.SPINE11308. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

PMID:
22054639
3.

Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis.

Deyo RA, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Jarvik JG, Angier H, Mirza SK.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 2;93(21):1979-86. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01292.

4.

Surgery for spinal stenosis: long-term reoperation rates, health care cost, and impact of instrumentation.

Lad SP, Babu R, Ugiliweneza B, Patil CG, Boakye M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 20;39(12):978-87. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000314.

PMID:
24718058
5.

Interspinous spacers compared with decompression or fusion for lumbar stenosis: complications and repeat operations in the Medicare population.

Deyo RA, Martin BI, Ching A, Tosteson AN, Jarvik JG, Kreuter W, Mirza SK.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 1;38(10):865-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828631b8.

6.

Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.

Kim CH, Chung CK, Park CS, Choi B, Hahn S, Kim MJ, Lee KS, Park BJ.

Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1230-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

PMID:
24017959
7.

Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.

Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG.

JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1259-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.338.

8.

Perioperative outcomes, complications, and costs associated with lumbar spinal fusion in older patients with spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis.

Ong KL, Auerbach JD, Lau E, Schmier J, Ochoa JA.

Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Jun;36(6):E5. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.FOCUS1440.

PMID:
24881637
9.

Surgical treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Chen E, Tong KB, Laouri M.

Spine J. 2010 Jul;10(7):588-94. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.026. Epub 2010 Apr 8.

PMID:
20381431
10.

5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery.

Malter AD, McNeney B, Loeser JD, Deyo RA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Apr 1;23(7):814-20.

PMID:
9563113
11.

Use of bone morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion surgery for older adults with lumbar stenosis: trends, complications, repeat surgery, and charges.

Deyo RA, Ching A, Matsen L, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Jarvik JG, Angier H, Mirza SK.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 1;37(3):222-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821bfa3a.

12.

Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.

Adogwa O, Owens R, Karikari I, Agarwal V, Gottfried ON, Bagley CA, Isaacs RE, Cheng JS.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):147-53. doi: 10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12226. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

PMID:
23231358
13.

Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.

Rampersaud YR, Tso P, Walker KR, Lewis SJ, Davey JR, Mahomed NN, Coyte PC.

Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

PMID:
24239803
14.

Factors influencing 2-year health care costs in patients undergoing revision lumbar fusion procedures.

Parker SL, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Apr;16(4):323-8. doi: 10.3171/2011.12.SPINE11750. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

PMID:
22284228
15.
16.

Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?

Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19):2119-26.

PMID:
17762814
17.

Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?: A two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients.

Försth P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B.

Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):960-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.30776.

PMID:
23814250
18.

Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.

PMID:
20975594
19.

Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion for adjacent-segment disease: defining the value of surgical intervention.

Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, Devin CJ, Cheng JS, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Feb;16(2):141-6. doi: 10.3171/2011.9.SPINE11419. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

PMID:
22054637
20.

Rate of revision surgery after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Nemani VM, Aichmair A, Taher F, Lebl DR, Hughes AP, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 1;39(5):E326-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000141.

PMID:
24299718
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk