Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 81

1.

Making ESCRO committees work in New York.

Ellison B.

Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(1):63-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.747031. No abstract available.

PMID:
23311851
2.

ESCRO committees--not dead yet.

Devereaux M, Kalichman M.

Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(1):59-60. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.747311. No abstract available.

3.

The great ESCRO experiment: there is still value to be gained.

Lomax G.

Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(1):55-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.747034. No abstract available.

PMID:
23311847
4.

Stem cell research oversight: personal reflections and public reasoning.

Robert JS.

Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(1):66-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.747319. No abstract available.

PMID:
23311853
5.

Assessing ESCROs: yesterday and tomorrow.

Greely HT.

Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(1):44-52. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.747340. No abstract available.

PMID:
23311845
6.
7.

Justifying tomorrow's ESCROs.

Brewer CD, DeGrote H.

Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(1):65-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.747025. No abstract available.

PMID:
23311852
8.

Evaluating ESCROs: perspectives from the University of Connecticut.

Chapman AR.

Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(1):57-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.747026. No abstract available.

PMID:
23311848
9.

Dissolution of ESCROs and evolution of a national ethics committee for scientific advancement.

Aultman J.

Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(1):61-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.747023. No abstract available.

PMID:
23311850
10.

Long shadow of the stem-cell ruling.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2010 Oct 28;467(7319):1031-3. doi: 10.1038/4671031a. No abstract available.

PMID:
20981069
11.

Promoting public trust: ESCROs won't fix the problem of stem cell tourism.

Master Z, Resnik DB.

Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(1):53-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.747028. No abstract available.

12.

US election: Know your representatives.

Goldstein L.

Nature. 2012 Sep 27;489(7417):494-5. doi: 10.1038/489494a. No abstract available.

PMID:
23018948
13.

Unscrambling the eggs: cybrid research through an Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee (ESCRO) lens.

Chapman A, Hiskes AL.

Am J Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(12):44-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160802559245. No abstract available.

PMID:
19085476
14.

On moral incoherence and hidden battles: stem cell research in Argentina.

Luna F, Salles A.

Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(3):120-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00275.x.

PMID:
20089053
15.

Between public opinion and public policy: human embryonic stem-cell research and path-dependency.

Latham SR.

J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Winter;37(4):800-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00451.x.

PMID:
20122126
16.

Stem cell policies in the United States and in Germany.

Gottweis H.

Policy Stud J. 2002;30(4):444-69.

PMID:
17256227
17.

Social policy formulation and the role of professionals: the involvement of social workers in parliamentary committees in Israel.

Gal J, Weiss-Gal I.

Health Soc Care Community. 2011 Mar;19(2):158-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00955.x. Epub 2010 Sep 29.

PMID:
20880087
18.

Federal funding and the regulation of embryonic stem cell research: the Pontius Pilate maneuver.

Levine RJ.

Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2009 Summer;9 Suppl:552-64. No abstract available.

PMID:
19757720
19.

The curious case of Housing First: the limits of evidence based policy.

Stanhope V, Dunn K.

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;34(4):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Jul 31.

PMID:
21807412
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk