Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 135

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23282352)

1.

NIH funding: It does support innovators.

Salzberg SL.

Nature. 2013 Jan 3;493(7430):26. doi: 10.1038/493026b. No abstract available.

PMID:
23282352
2.

NIH funding: The critics respond.

Ioannidis JP, Nicholson JM.

Nature. 2013 Jan 3;493(7430):26. doi: 10.1038/493026c. No abstract available.

PMID:
23282353
3.

NIH funding: Agency rebuts critique.

Santangelo G, Lipman DJ.

Nature. 2013 Jan 3;493(7430):26. doi: 10.1038/493026a. No abstract available.

PMID:
23282354
4.

NIH funding: Thousand-citation papers are outliers.

Woodgett J.

Nature. 2012 Dec 20;492(7429):356. doi: 10.1038/492356b. No abstract available.

PMID:
23257869
5.

Research grants: Conform and be funded.

Nicholson JM, Ioannidis JP.

Nature. 2012 Dec 6;492(7427):34-6. doi: 10.1038/492034a. No abstract available.

PMID:
23222591
6.

NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.

Hannun YA.

Nature. 2008 Apr 17;452(7189):811. doi: 10.1038/452811c. No abstract available.

PMID:
18421328
7.

Extra scrutiny for 'grandee grantees'.

Hand E.

Nature. 2012 Feb 20;482(7386):450-1. doi: 10.1038/482450a. No abstract available.

PMID:
22358805
8.

222 NIH grants: 22 researchers.

Hand E.

Nature. 2008 Mar 20;452(7185):258-9. doi: 10.1038/452258a. No abstract available.

PMID:
18354436
9.

NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.

Roy HK.

Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):176. doi: 10.1038/490176a. No abstract available.

PMID:
23060177
10.

NIH responds to critics on peer review.

Wadman M.

Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):835. doi: 10.1038/453835a. No abstract available.

PMID:
18548033
11.

Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.

Berg JM.

Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):203. doi: 10.1038/489203a. No abstract available.

PMID:
22972279
12.

NIH: researchers lose out to war, not to each other.

Vermund SH.

Nature. 2008 Apr 17;452(7189):811. doi: 10.1038/452811d. No abstract available.

PMID:
18421327
13.

An unhealthy obsession.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2012 Dec 6;492(7427):7. No abstract available.

PMID:
23236611
14.

Revamp for NIH grants.

Wadman M.

Nature. 2008 Feb 28;451(7182):1035. doi: 10.1038/4511035a. No abstract available.

PMID:
18305502
15.

Give postdocs a career, not empty promises.

Rohn J.

Nature. 2011 Mar 3;471(7336):7. doi: 10.1038/471007a. No abstract available.

PMID:
21368781
16.

NIH funds support more than a researcher's own lab.

Varmus H.

Nature. 2008 Apr 17;452(7189):811. doi: 10.1038/452811b. No abstract available.

PMID:
18421329
17.

Research funding: Closing arguments.

Wadman M.

Nature. 2009 Feb 5;457(7230):650-5. doi: 10.1038/457650a. No abstract available.

PMID:
19194426
18.

Grant applications: Undo NIH policy to ease effect of cuts.

Benezra R.

Nature. 2013 Jan 24;493(7433):480. doi: 10.1038/493480e. No abstract available.

PMID:
23344348
19.

Shorter NIH grant form launches.

Wadman M.

Nature. 2010 Jan 7;463(7277):12-3. doi: 10.1038/463012b. No abstract available.

PMID:
20054365
20.

Grants fall victim to NIH success.

Giles J, Wadman M.

Nature. 2006 Oct 26;443(7114):894-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
17065999
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk