Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Readability of "Dear Patient" device advisory notification letters created by a device manufacturer.

Mueller LA, Sharma A, Ottenberg AL, Mueller PS.

Heart Rhythm. 2013 Apr;10(4):501-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.12.022. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

PMID:
23274371
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Perspectives of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices who received advisory warnings.

Ottenberg AL, Mueller LA, Mueller PS.

Heart Lung. 2013 Jan-Feb;42(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.09.007.

PMID:
23305915
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

Device advisory letters: readability and comprehension, patient-centered outcomes not to be "misunderstood".

Kim MH.

Heart Rhythm. 2013 Apr;10(4):508-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Jan 8. No abstract available.

PMID:
23313800
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Readability of state-sponsored advance directive forms in the United States: a cross sectional study.

Mueller LA, Reid KI, Mueller PS.

BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Apr 25;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-6.

PMID:
20416105
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
5.

Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.

Wilson M.

Clin Nurse Spec. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NUR.0000343079.50214.31.

PMID:
19098513
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Analysis of patient information leaflets provided by a district general hospital by the Flesch and Flesch-Kincaid method.

Williamson JM, Martin AG.

Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;64(13):1824-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02408.x.

PMID:
21070533
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.

Sanghvi S, Cherla DV, Shukla PA, Eloy JA.

Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1943-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23424. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

PMID:
22833340
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.

Walsh TM, Volsko TA.

Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1310-5.

PMID:
18811992
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
9.

Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.

Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL.

N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721-6.

PMID:
12594317
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
10.

Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.

Vives M, Young L, Sabharwal S.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2826-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4bb0c.

PMID:
19910867
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Readability of out-patient letters copied to patients: can patients understand what is written about them?

Todhunter SL, Clamp PJ, Gillett S, Pothier DD.

J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Mar;124(3):324-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215109991770. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

PMID:
19954560
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.

Cherla DV, Sanghvi S, Choudhry OJ, Liu JK, Eloy JA.

Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1649-54. doi: 10.1002/lary.23309. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

PMID:
22685030
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to acoustic neuromas.

Cherla DV, Sanghvi S, Choudhry OJ, Jyung RW, Eloy JA, Liu JK.

Otol Neurotol. 2013 Sep;34(7):1349-54. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829530e5.

PMID:
23921935
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Readability levels of individualized family service plans.

Pizur-Barnekow K, Patrick T, Rhyner PM, Folk L, Anderson K.

Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2010 Aug;30(3):248-58. doi: 10.3109/01942631003780869.

PMID:
20608861
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

A readability assessment of online stroke information.

Sharma N, Tridimas A, Fitzsimmons PR.

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Jul;23(6):1362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.11.017. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

PMID:
24389374
[PubMed - in process]
16.

Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials.

Amini H, Casamassimo PS, Lin HL, Hayes JR.

Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):431-5.

PMID:
18027780
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to uterine artery embolization.

Shukla P, Sanghvi SP, Lelkes VM, Kumar A, Contractor S.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

PMID:
23452554
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web.

D'Alessandro DM, Kingsley P, Johnson-West J.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jul;155(7):807-12.

PMID:
11434848
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care.

Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Sep;27(9):1165-70. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2046-0. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

PMID:
22528620
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
20.

Anticoagulant patient information material is written at high readability levels.

Estrada CA, Hryniewicz MM, Higgs VB, Collins C, Byrd JC.

Stroke. 2000 Dec;31(12):2966-70.

PMID:
11108757
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk