Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 258

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23269736)

1.

Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity.

Humphries RM, Uslan DZ, Rubin Z.

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):869-73. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02970-12. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

2.

Superiority of the DNA amplification assay for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection: a clinical comparison of fecal tests.

Barkin JA, Nandi N, Miller N, Grace A, Barkin JS, Sussman DA.

Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Oct;57(10):2592-9. Epub 2012 May 11.

PMID:
22576711
3.

Evaluation of three enzyme immunoassays and a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Bruins MJ, Verbeek E, Wallinga JA, Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet LE, Kuijper EJ, Bloembergen P.

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;31(11):3035-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1658-y. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

PMID:
22706512
4.

Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.

Novak-Weekley SM, Marlowe EM, Miller JM, Cumpio J, Nomura JH, Vance PH, Weissfeld A.

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):889-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01801-09. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

5.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.

Boyanton BL Jr, Sural P, Loomis CR, Pesta C, Gonzalez-Krellwitz L, Robinson-Dunn B, Riska P.

J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Mar;50(3):640-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01014-11. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

6.

Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Goldenberg SD, Cliff PR, Smith S, Milner M, French GL.

J Hosp Infect. 2010 Jan;74(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Nov 8.

PMID:
19900734
7.

Clinical relevance of a positive molecular test in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Baker I, Leeming JP, Reynolds R, Ibrahim I, Darley E.

J Hosp Infect. 2013 Aug;84(4):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

PMID:
23831282
8.
10.

Comparison of testing approaches for Clostridium difficile infection at a large community hospital.

Grein JD, Ochner M, Hoang H, Jin A, Morgan MA, Murthy AR.

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Jan;20(1):65-9. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12198. Epub 2013 Mar 23.

11.

Overcoming barriers to effective recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Wilcox MH.

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18 Suppl 6:13-20. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12057. Review.

12.

Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.

Tenover FC, Novak-Weekley S, Woods CW, Peterson LR, Davis T, Schreckenberger P, Fang FC, Dascal A, Gerding DN, Nomura JH, Goering RV, Akerlund T, Weissfeld AS, Baron EJ, Wong E, Marlowe EM, Whitmore J, Persing DH.

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3719-24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00427-10. Epub 2010 Aug 11.

13.

Clinical impact of switching conventional enzyme immunoassay with nucleic acid amplification test for suspected Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Johnson SW, Kanatani M, Humphries RM, Uslan DZ.

Am J Infect Control. 2013 Apr;41(4):373-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.04.329. Epub 2012 Oct 5.

PMID:
23040489
14.

Repeat stool testing to diagnose Clostridium difficile infection using enzyme immunoassay does not increase diagnostic yield.

Deshpande A, Pasupuleti V, Patel P, Ajani G, Hall G, Hu B, Jain A, Rolston DD.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):665-669.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.030. Epub 2011 May 13.

PMID:
21635969
15.

Comparison of antigen and two molecular methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins.

Ylisiurua P, Koskela M, Vainio O, Tuokko H.

Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.708780. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

PMID:
22998479
16.

Prospective comparison of a commercial multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction and an enzyme immunoassay with toxigenic culture in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated infections.

Hernández-Rocha C, Barra-Carrasco J, Álvarez-Lobos M, Paredes-Sabja D, Guzmán-Durán AM.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;75(4):361-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

PMID:
23415540
17.

Diagnostic value of repeated enzyme immunoassays in Clostridium difficile infection.

Nemat H, Khan R, Ashraf MS, Matta M, Ahmed S, Edwards BT, Hussain R, Lesser M, Pekmezaris R, Dlugacz Y, Wolf-Klein G.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug;104(8):2035-41. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.174. Epub 2009 Apr 14.

PMID:
19367273
18.

Clostridium difficile colitis: an efficient clinical approach to diagnosis.

Manabe YC, Vinetz JM, Moore RD, Merz C, Charache P, Bartlett JG.

Ann Intern Med. 1995 Dec 1;123(11):835-40.

PMID:
7486465
19.

Impact of the type of diagnostic assay on Clostridium difficile infection and complication rates in a mandatory reporting program.

Longtin Y, Trottier S, Brochu G, Paquet-Bolduc B, Garenc C, Loungnarath V, Beaulieu C, Goulet D, Longtin J.

Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(1):67-73. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis840. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

20.

Detection of Clostridium difficile infection: a suggested laboratory diagnostic algorithm.

Wren MW, Kinson R, Sivapalan M, Shemko M, Shetty NR.

Br J Biomed Sci. 2009;66(4):175-9.

PMID:
20095124
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk