Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 124

1.

Needle echogenicity in sonographically guided regional anesthesia: blinded comparison of 4 enhanced needles and validation of visual criteria for evaluation.

Sviggum HP, Ahn K, Dilger JA, Smith HM.

J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Jan;32(1):143-8.

PMID:
23269719
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
2.

Echogenic technology can improve needle visibility during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Hebard S, Hocking G.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):185-9.

PMID:
21425515
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

A review of the benefits and pitfalls of phantoms in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Hocking G, Hebard S, Mitchell CH.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):162-70. Review.

PMID:
21425513
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Echogenic regional anaesthesia needles: a comparison study in Thiel cadavers.

Guo S, Schwab A, McLeod G, Corner G, Cochran S, Eisma R, Soames R.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Apr;38(4):702-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.01.001.

PMID:
22390992
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

In-vitro visualization of biopsy needles with ultrasound: a comparative study of standard and echogenic needles using an ultrasound phantom.

Hopkins RE, Bradley M.

Clin Radiol. 2001 Jun;56(6):499-502.

PMID:
11428801
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Compound imaging technology and echogenic needle design: effects on needle visibility and tissue imaging.

Wiesmann T, Bornträger A, Zoremba M, Neff M, Wulf H, Steinfeldt T.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;38(5):452-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31829730d5.

PMID:
23759709
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Two-dimensional mapping to assess direction and magnitude of needle tip error in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.

Hebard S, Hocking G, Murray K.

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Nov;39(6):1076-81.

PMID:
22165361
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Optimizing the safety and practice of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: the role of echogenic technology.

Hocking G, Mitchell CH.

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Oct;25(5):603-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328356b835. Review.

PMID:
22825047
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Ultrasound characteristics of needles for regional anesthesia.

Maecken T, Zenz M, Grau T.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):440-7.

PMID:
17961844
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Needle visibility in different tissue models for ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.

Wiesmann T, Bornträger A, Neff M, Wulf H, Steinfeldt T.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Oct;56(9):1152-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02758.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

PMID:
22897671
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Treated needles: do they facilitate sonographically guided biopsies?

Jandzinski DI, Carson N, Davis D, Rubens DJ, Voci SL, Gottlieb RH.

J Ultrasound Med. 2003 Nov;22(11):1233-7.

PMID:
14620895
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
12.

Needle echogenicity in ultrasound-guided lumbar spine injections: a cadaveric study.

Gofeld M, Krashin DL, Ahn S.

Pain Physician. 2013 Nov-Dec;16(6):E725-30.

PMID:
24284853
[PubMed - in process]
Free Article
13.

Differences in tip visibility and nerve block parameters between two echogenic needles during a simulation study with inexperienced anesthesia trainees.

Kilicaslan A, Topal A, Tavlan A, Erol A, Otelcioglu S.

J Anesth. 2014 Jun;28(3):460-2. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1720-7. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

PMID:
24127134
[PubMed - in process]
14.

Ultrasound visibility of needles used for regional nerve block: an in vitro study.

Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, McCulloch CE, Gray AT.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;29(5):480-8.

PMID:
15372394
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

In vitro randomized comparison of a standard and novel echogenic needle for ultrasonography-guided renal targeting.

Nguyen V, Menhadji A, Chu R, Cho J, Osann K, Bucur P, Patel P, Okhunov Z, Lusch A, McDougall E, Landman J.

J Endourol. 2013 Oct;27(10):1277-81. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0292. Epub 2013 Sep 14.

PMID:
23799803
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Needle visualization in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: challenges and solutions.

Chin KJ, Perlas A, Chan VW, Brull R.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;33(6):532-44. Review.

PMID:
19258968
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Needle visualization in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: technological challenges and educational solutions.

Halaszynski TM, Kurup V, Souzdalnitski D.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):527-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b4c8e7. No abstract available. Erratum in: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):114. Souzdalnitzski, Dmitri [corrected to Souzdalnitski, Dmitri].

PMID:
19749594
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The learning process of the hydrolocalization technique performed during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Bloc S, Mercadal L, Dessieux T, Garnier T, Estebe JP, Le Naoures A, Komly B, Leclerc P, Morel B, Ecoffey C, Dhonneur G.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Apr;54(4):421-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02195.x. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

PMID:
20085548
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: how much practice do novices require before achieving competency in ultrasound needle visualization using a cadaver model.

Barrington MJ, Wong DM, Slater B, Ivanusic JJ, Ovens M.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):334-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182475fba.

PMID:
22354107
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Do echo-enhanced needles make a difference in sonographically guided vascular access?

Crum T, Adhikari S, Lander L, Blaivas M.

J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Apr;33(4):623-8. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.4.623.

PMID:
24658941
[PubMed - in process]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk