Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 123

1.

Maximizing the spectral and temporal benefits of two clinically used sound processing strategies for cochlear implants.

Won JH, Nie K, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Dec;16(4):201-10. doi: 10.1177/1084713812467855.

PMID:
23264570
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.

Donaldson GS, Dawson PK, Borden LZ.

Ear Hear. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):238-50. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fb8390.

PMID:
21084987
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits.

Golub JS, Won JH, Drennan WR, Worman TD, Rubinstein JT.

Otol Neurotol. 2012 Feb;33(2):147-53. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318241b6d3.

PMID:
22215451
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
4.

Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.

Li T, Fu QJ.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Aug;50(8):498-502. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.576274. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

PMID:
21696330
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
5.

Advantages from bilateral hearing in speech perception in noise with simulated cochlear implants and residual acoustic hearing.

Schoof T, Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb;133(2):1017-30. doi: 10.1121/1.4773274.

PMID:
23363118
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.

Won JH, Jones GL, Drennan WR, Jameyson EM, Rubinstein JT.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2088-97. doi: 10.1121/1.3624820.

PMID:
21973363
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
7.

Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Han D, Liu B, Zhou N, Chen X, Kong Y, Liu H, Zheng Y, Xu L.

Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):169-77. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819342cf.

PMID:
19194297
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
8.

Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.

Bhattacharya A, Vandali A, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):2951-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3641401.

PMID:
22087923
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
9.

HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.

Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Segel P, Kessler D.

Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):214-23.

PMID:
15205549
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.

Li X, Nie K, Imennov NS, Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT, Atlas LE.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3387-98. doi: 10.1121/1.4756827.

PMID:
23145619
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
11.

The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.

Chen F, Wong LL, Tahmina Q, Azimi B, Hu Y.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):EL142-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4737595.

PMID:
22894313
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.

Anderson ES, Oxenham AJ, Nelson PB, Nelson DA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Dec;132(6):3925-34. doi: 10.1121/1.4763999.

PMID:
23231122
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
13.

Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2054-62. doi: 10.1121/1.3631563.

PMID:
21973360
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

Sensitivity of psychophysical measures to signal processor modifications in cochlear implant users.

Drennan WR, Won JH, Nie K, Jameyson E, Rubinstein JT.

Hear Res. 2010 Apr;262(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Feb 6.

PMID:
20144699
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.

Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.

Hazrati O, Sadjadi SO, Loizou PC, Hansen JH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Nov;134(5):3759-65. doi: 10.1121/1.4823839.

PMID:
24180786
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system.

Holden LK, Reeder RM, Firszt JB, Finley CC.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Apr;50(4):255-69. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.533200. Epub 2011 Jan 28.

PMID:
21275500
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
17.

Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63.

PMID:
11519582
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Qin MK, Oxenham AJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jul;114(1):446-54.

PMID:
12880055
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Won JH, Drennan WR, Nie K, Jameyson EM, Rubinstein JT.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jul;130(1):376-88. doi: 10.1121/1.3592521.

PMID:
21786906
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
20.

The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.

Aronoff JM, Freed DJ, Fisher LM, Pal I, Soli SD.

Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):468-84. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820dd3f0.

PMID:
21412155
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk