Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 115

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23262932)

1.

The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy.

Woelk JL, Casiano ER, Weaver AL, Gostout BS, Trabuco EC, Gebhart JB.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):87-95. doi: http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827a029e.

PMID:
23262932
2.

Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy.

Akdemir A, Zeybek B, Ozgurel B, Oztekin MK, Sendag F.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):384-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

PMID:
24952342
3.

Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.

Pulliam SJ, Weinstein MM, Wakamatsu MM.

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):122-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31824a3995.

PMID:
22453324
4.

Analysis of the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Sendag F, Zeybek B, Akdemir A, Ozgurel B, Oztekin K.

Int J Med Robot. 2014 Sep;10(3):275-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1567. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

PMID:
24376016
5.

A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, Carlson MJ, Valmadre S, Phillips GS, Cohn DE.

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.017. Epub 2009 May 9.

PMID:
19428096
6.

Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Richardson DL, Valmadre S, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM.

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818e4416.

PMID:
19037027
7.

Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome.

Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G, Ruggiero M, Tana R, Pluchino N.

Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2638-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2780-8. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23392975
8.

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

PMID:
20207063
9.

The benefits and challenges of robotic-assisted hysterectomy.

Smorgick N, As-Sanie S.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;26(4):290-4. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000080. Review.

PMID:
24914631
10.

A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer.

Lowe MP, Johnson PR, Kamelle SA, Kumar S, Chamberlain DH, Tillmanns TD.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):236-43. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181af2a74.

PMID:
19622983
11.

Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy.

Bernardini MQ, Gien LT, Tipping H, Murphy J, Rosen BP.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Jan;22(1):76-81. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182353371.

PMID:
22134121
12.

Learning curve for transoral robotic surgery: a 4-year analysis.

White HN, Frederick J, Zimmerman T, Carroll WR, Magnuson JS.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jun;139(6):564-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3007.

PMID:
23680949
13.
14.
15.

Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience.

Jayaraman S, Davies W, Schlachta CM.

Can J Surg. 2009 Oct;52(5):374-8.

16.

Fellowship learning curve associated with completing a robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Sandadi S, Gadzinski JA, Lee S, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Jewell EL, Brown CL, Gardner GJ, Barakat RR, Leitao MM Jr.

Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;132(1):102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.017. Epub 2013 Nov 18.

PMID:
24262878
17.

Robotic adrenalectomy: technical aspects, early results and learning curve.

D'Annibale A, Lucandri G, Monsellato I, De Angelis M, Pernazza G, Alfano G, Mazzocchi P, Pende V.

Int J Med Robot. 2012 Dec;8(4):483-90. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1454. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

PMID:
23081692
18.

A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD.

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 May;113(2):191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

PMID:
19249082
19.

Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Linder BJ, Anand M, Weaver AL, Woelk JL, Klingele CJ, Trabuco EC, Occhino JA, Gebhart JB.

Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Aug 21. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
26294206
20.

Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.

Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, Randall TC.

Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 7.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk