Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 120

1.

The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm.

Schmidt JR.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jan;142(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

PMID:
23261421
2.

Can contingency learning alone account for item-specific control? Evidence from within- and between-language ISPC effects.

Atalay NB, Misirlisoy M.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1578-90. doi: 10.1037/a0028458. Epub 2012 May 7.

PMID:
22563632
3.

Temporal learning and list-level proportion congruency: conflict adaptation or learning when to respond?

Schmidt JR.

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 28;8(11):e82320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082320. eCollection 2013.

4.

Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.

Bugg JM, Jacoby LL, Chanani S.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):844-59. doi: 10.1037/a0019957.

PMID:
20718569
5.

The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.

Hutchison KA.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):851-60. doi: 10.1037/a0023437.

PMID:
21517220
6.

Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.

Bugg JM, Hutchison KA.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):433-49. doi: 10.1037/a0029145. Epub 2012 Jul 30.

PMID:
22845037
7.

The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.

Schmidt JR, Besner D.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):514-23. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514.

PMID:
18444752
8.

The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.

Duthoo W, Abrahamse EL, Braem S, Boehler CN, Notebaert W.

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 23;9(10):e110462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110462. eCollection 2014.

9.

Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure.

Torres-Quesada M, Funes MJ, Lupiáñez J.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Feb;142(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.015. Epub 2013 Jan 20.

PMID:
23337083
10.

Attention modulation by proportion congruency: the asymmetrical list shifting effect.

Abrahamse EL, Duthoo W, Notebaert W, Risko EF.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1552-62. doi: 10.1037/a0032426. Epub 2013 Apr 8.

PMID:
23565794
11.

Resolved but not forgotten: Stroop conflict dredges up the past.

Hazeltine E, Mordkoff JT.

Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 20;5:1327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01327. eCollection 2014.

12.

Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: conflict adaptation or temporal learning?

Schmidt JR, Weissman DH.

Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):590-607. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0681-x. Epub 2015 Jun 21.

PMID:
26093801
13.

It is not what you expect: dissociating conflict adaptation from expectancies in a Stroop task.

Jiménez L, Méndez A.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):271-84. doi: 10.1037/a0027734. Epub 2012 Mar 19.

PMID:
22428671
14.

ISPC effect is not observed when the word comes too late: a time course analysis.

Atalay NB, Misirlisoy M.

Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 5;5:1410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01410. eCollection 2014.

15.

Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects.

Wühr P, Duthoo W, Notebaert W.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(4):779-801. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.966729. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

PMID:
25380403
16.

Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.

Hutchison KA, Bugg JM, Lim YB, Olsen MR.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 May;78(4):1087-103. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1066-y.

PMID:
26860710
17.

Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered.

Schmidt JR.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):615-30. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0. Review.

PMID:
23325703
18.

Contingency learning is not affected by conflict experience: Evidence from a task conflict-free, item-specific Stroop paradigm.

Levin Y, Tzelgov J.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Feb;164:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

PMID:
26720099
19.

Proportion congruency effects: instructions may be enough.

Entel O, Tzelgov J, Bereby-Meyer Y.

Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 6;5:1108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01108. eCollection 2014.

20.

Context-specific temporal learning with non-conflict stimuli: proof-of-principle for a learning account of context-specific proportion congruent effects.

Schmidt JR, Lemercier C, De Houwer J.

Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 30;5:1241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01241. eCollection 2014.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk