Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 95

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23225131)

1.

[Editorial].

Öztürk MO.

Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2012 Winter;23(4):A7. Turkish. No abstract available.

2.

Editorial independence in the electronic age: new threats, old owners?

Hoey J.

Mens Sana Monogr. 2008 Jan;6(1):226-36. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.40568.

3.
4.

Editorial bias in scientific publications.

Matías-Guiu J, García-Ramos R.

Neurologia. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2010.11.001. Epub 2011 Jan 8. English, Spanish.

5.

How international are the leading orthopedic journals: a look at the composition of the editorial board members of the top orthopedic journals.

Meena S, Chowdhury B.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 May;134(5):619-22. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-1975-y. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

PMID:
24639199
6.

The prevalence and influence of self-reported conflicts of interest by editorial authors of phase III cancer trials.

Lerner TG, Miranda Mda C, Lera AT, Ueda A, Briones B, Del Giglio A, Riechelmann R.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):1019-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

PMID:
22664644
7.

A longitudinal social network analysis of the editorial boards of medical informatics and bioinformatics journals.

Malin B, Carley K.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):340-8. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

8.

Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals.

Amrein K, Langmann A, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Pieber TR, Zollner-Schwetz I.

Gend Med. 2011 Dec;8(6):378-87. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2011.10.007.

PMID:
22153882
9.
10.

Differences in editorial board reviewer behavior based on gender.

Wing DA, Benner RS, Petersen R, Newcomb R, Scott JR.

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Oct;19(10):1919-23. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1904.

PMID:
20831430
11.
12.
13.

Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management.

Cho AH, Johnson SA, Schuman CE, Adler JM, Gonzalez O, Graves SJ, Huebner JR, Marchant DB, Rifai SW, Skinner I, Bruna EM.

PeerJ. 2014 Aug 21;2:e542. doi: 10.7717/peerj.542. eCollection 2014.

14.

WORK: a historical evaluation of the impact and evolution of its editorial board.

Shaw L, Prodinger B, Jacobs K, Shaw N.

Work. 2010;35(3):247-55. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-0988.

PMID:
20364049
15.

[The editorial process for Radiología].

Corral de la Calle MA.

Radiologia. 2011 Jul-Aug;53(4):305-14. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Jun 21. Spanish.

16.

Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals.

Luty J, Arokiadass SM, Easow JM, Anapreddy JR.

J Med Ethics. 2009 Mar;35(3):200-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.026740.

PMID:
19251974
17.

Editorial peer review in US medical journals.

Weller AC.

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1344-7.

PMID:
2406471
19.
20.

Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.

Jefferson T, Rudin M, Brodney Folse S, Davidoff F.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000016. Review.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk