Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 196

1.

Long-term follow-up of minimal-access and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.

Cheung NK, Ferch RD, Ghahreman A, Bogduk N.

Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar;72(3):443-50; discussion 450-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827fce96.

PMID:
23208069
2.

Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.

PMID:
20975594
3.

Minimal access versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of spondylolisthesis.

Ghahreman A, Ferch RD, Rao PJ, Bogduk N.

Neurosurgery. 2010 Feb;66(2):296-304; discussion 304. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000363600.24074.D0.

PMID:
20087129
6.

[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].

Zencica P, Chaloupka R, Hladíková J, Krbec M.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30. Czech.

PMID:
20447355
7.
8.

Low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in U.S. servicemen.

Molinari RW, Sloboda JF, Arrington EC.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Feb;18 Suppl:S24-9.

PMID:
15699802
9.

Microscopic anterior foraminal decompression combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Shin SH, Choi WG, Hwang BW, Tsang YS, Chung ER, Lee HC, Lee SJ, Lee SH.

Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1190-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.458. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

PMID:
24094988
10.

Comparison of posterolateral fusion with and without additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Ha KY, Na KH, Shin JH, Kim KW.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jun;21(4):229-34. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180eaa202.

PMID:
18525481
11.

Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine.

Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, Bae SC, Suk KS.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 20;31(12):1351-7; discussion 1358.

PMID:
16721298
12.

[Results of posterior lumbar intersomatic fusion in the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. Apropos of 27 cases followed over more than 10 years].

Lerat JL, Rubini J, Vincent P, Besse JL, Moyen B.

Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1996;82(6):475-89. French.

PMID:
9122519
13.

Prospective Study of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Either Interbody Graft or Interbody Cage in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Sivaraman A, Altaf F, Jalgaonkar A, Kakkar R, Sirigiri PB, Howieson A, Crawford RJ.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Oct;28(8):E467-71. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31829baac1.

PMID:
23839022
14.

Clinical outcomes of lumbar degenerative disc disease treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion allograft spacer: a prospective, multicenter trial with 2-year follow-up.

Arnold PM, Robbins S, Paullus W, Faust S, Holt R, McGuire R.

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009 Jul;38(7):E115-22.

PMID:
19714280
15.

Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.

Schiffman M, Brau SA, Henderson R, Gimmestad G.

Spine J. 2003 Sep-Oct;3(5):377-87.

PMID:
14588950
16.

Video-assisted ALIF with cage and anterior plate fixation for L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

Aunoble S, Hoste D, Donkersloot P, Liquois F, Basso Y, Le Huec JC.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Oct;19(7):471-6.

PMID:
17021409
17.

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Ekman P, Möller H, Tullberg T, Neumann P, Hedlund R.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20):2178-83.

PMID:
17873808
18.

Comparative study of radiographic disc height changes using two different interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: open box vs. fenestrated tube interbody cage.

Matsumura A, Taneichi H, Suda K, Kajino T, Moridaira H, Kaneda K.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):E871-6. Erratum in: Spine. 2007 Mar 15;32(6):709.

PMID:
17077723
19.

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes.

Müslüman AM, Yılmaz A, Cansever T, Cavuşoğlu H, Colak I, Genç HA, Aydın Y.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Apr;14(4):488-96. doi: 10.3171/2010.11.SPINE10281. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

PMID:
21314280
20.

Comparison between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with transpedicular screw fixation for isthmic spondylolithesis: a meta-analysis.

Ye YP, Xu H, Chen D.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Dec;133(12):1649-55. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1868-5. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk