Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Audio and visual analysis of urologic laparoscopic and robotic skills: objective criteria for surgical skill evaluation.

Herati AS, Montag S, Andonian S, Shapiro EY, Akerman M, Kavoussi LR, Richstone L.

Urology. 2012 Dec;80(6):1277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.065.

PMID:
23206774
2.

Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.

Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, Cai J, Ng CK, Aron M, Gill IS, Desai MM.

J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):1019-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.064. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

PMID:
21784469
3.

The endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy: a novel system in Japan.

Matsuda T, Ono Y, Terachi T, Naito S, Baba S, Miki T, Hirao Y, Okuyama A.

J Urol. 2006 Nov;176(5):2168-72; discussion 2172.

PMID:
17070285
4.

Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills.

Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ.

J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.032. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

PMID:
22099993
5.

A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R, Woo R, Reyes R, Hernandez-Boussard T, Dutta S.

Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):830-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

PMID:
20045162
6.

Evaluation of surgical performance during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a multicenter study.

Ghaderi I, Vaillancourt M, Sroka G, Kaneva PA, Vassiliou MC, Choy I, Okrainec A, Seagull FJ, Sutton E, George I, Park A, Brintzenhoff R, Stefanidis D, Fried GM, Feldman LS.

Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2555-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1586-4. Epub 2011 Feb 27.

PMID:
21359893
7.

Reliable assessment of laparoscopic performance in the operating room using videotape analysis.

Chang L, Hogle NJ, Moore BB, Graham MJ, Sinanan MN, Bailey R, Fowler DL.

Surg Innov. 2007 Jun;14(2):122-6.

PMID:
17558018
8.

FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill.

McCluney AL, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Cao J, Stanbridge DD, Feldman LS, Fried GM.

Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1991-5.

PMID:
17593434
9.

Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological laparoscopy: development and validation of a procedure-specific rating scale.

Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Soerensen JL, Ottesen B.

BJOG. 2008 Jun;115(7):908-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01732.x.

10.

Training and outcome monitoring in robotic urologic surgery.

Liberman D, Trinh QD, Jeldres C, Valiquette L, Zorn KC.

Nat Rev Urol. 2011 Nov 8;9(1):17-22. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.164. Review.

PMID:
22064640
11.

da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance.

Finnegan KT, Meraney AM, Staff I, Shichman SJ.

Urology. 2012 Aug;80(2):330-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.059. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

PMID:
22704177
12.

Construct validation of the key components of Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS) curriculum--a multi-institution prospective study.

Raza SJ, Froghi S, Chowriappa A, Ahmed K, Field E, Stegemann AP, Rehman S, Sharif M, Shi Y, Wilding GE, Kesavadas T, Kaouk J, Guru KA.

J Surg Educ. 2014 May-Jun;71(3):316-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.006. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

PMID:
24797846
13.

A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance.

Narula VK, Watson WC, Davis SS, Hinshaw K, Needleman BJ, Mikami DJ, Hazey JW, Winston JH, Muscarella P, Rubin M, Patel V, Melvin WS.

Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2258-61. Epub 2007 May 24.

PMID:
17522931
14.

Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises.

Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ.

Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1516-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2102-6. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

PMID:
22350226
15.

Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an electromagnetic instrument tracker.

Tausch TJ, Kowalewski TM, White LW, McDonough PS, Brand TC, Lendvay TS.

J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):919-23. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22819403
16.

Evaluating intraoperative laparoscopic skill: direct observation versus blinded videotaped performances.

Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Fraser SA, Charlebois P, Chaudhury P, Stanbridge DD, Fried GM.

Surg Innov. 2007 Sep;14(3):211-6.

PMID:
17928621
17.

A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Palter VN, Grantcharov TP.

Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2489-503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2220-9. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

PMID:
22476826
18.

Laparoscopic surgical skills assessment: can simulators replace experts?

Pellen M, Horgan L, Roger Barton J, Attwood S.

World J Surg. 2009 Mar;33(3):440-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9866-4.

PMID:
19123023
19.

Rapid adaptation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Park SS, Kim MC, Park MS, Hyung WJ.

Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1828-5. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

PMID:
21789643
20.

Can both residents and chief physicians assess surgical skills?

Oestergaard J, Larsen CR, Maagaard M, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL.

Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):2054-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2155-1. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

PMID:
22271335
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk