Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

The effects of the previous outcome on probabilistic choice in rats.

Marshall AT, Kirkpatrick K.

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Jan;39(1):24-38. doi: 10.1037/a0030765. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

3.

Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.

Mazur JE.

Behav Processes. 2007 Jun;75(2):220-4. Epub 2007 Feb 8.

PMID:
17343994
4.

Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers.

Mazur JE, Biondi DR.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jan;95(1):41-56. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-41.

5.

Relative gains, losses, and reference points in probabilistic choice in rats.

Marshall AT, Kirkpatrick K.

PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117697. eCollection 2015.

6.

Intracranial self-stimulation as a positive reinforcer to study impulsivity in a probability discounting paradigm.

Rokosik SL, Napier TC.

J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jun 15;198(2):260-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.04.025. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

PMID:
21536069
7.

Distributed versus exclusive preference in discrete-trial choice.

Mazur JE.

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jul;36(3):321-33. doi: 10.1037/a0017588.

8.

Contributions of the nucleus accumbens and its subregions to different aspects of risk-based decision making.

Stopper CM, Floresco SB.

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar;11(1):97-112. doi: 10.3758/s13415-010-0015-9.

PMID:
21264647
9.

Choice and contingency in the development of behavioral autonomy during instrumental conditioning.

Kosaki Y, Dickinson A.

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jul;36(3):334-42. doi: 10.1037/a0016887.

PMID:
20658864
10.

Obese and lean Zucker rats demonstrate differential sensitivity to rates of food reinforcement in a choice procedure.

Buckley JL, Rasmussen EB.

Physiol Behav. 2012 Dec 25;108:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 6.

11.

Self-choice enhances value in reward-seeking in primates.

Setogawa T, Mizuhiki T, Matsumoto N, Akizawa F, Shidara M.

Neurosci Res. 2014 Mar;80:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

PMID:
24463226
12.

Effects of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.

Mobini S, Chiang TJ, Ho MY, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E.

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Nov;152(4):390-7.

PMID:
11140331
13.

Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.

Mobini S, Body S, Ho MY, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, Deakin JF, Anderson IM.

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Mar;160(3):290-8. Epub 2002 Jan 25.

PMID:
11889498
14.

Intact risk-based decision making in rats with prefrontal or accumbens dopamine depletion.

Mai B, Hauber W.

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Dec;12(4):719-29. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0115-9.

PMID:
22923036
15.

Effect of orbitofrontal cortex lesions on temporal discounting in rats.

Jo S, Kim KU, Lee D, Jung MW.

Behav Brain Res. 2013 May 15;245:22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

16.

Choice between reinforcer delays versus choice between reinforcer magnitudes: differential Fos expression in the orbital prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens core.

da Costa Ara├║jo S, Body S, Valencia Torres L, Olarte Sanchez CM, Bak VK, Deakin JF, Anderson IM, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E.

Behav Brain Res. 2010 Dec 1;213(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 May 16.

17.

Optimal decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex.

Kennerley SW, Walton ME, Behrens TE, Buckley MJ, Rushworth MF.

Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):940-7. Epub 2006 Jun 18.

PMID:
16783368
18.

[Individual prognostic behavioral features in dogs during the choice between probability and value of reinforcement].

Chilingarian LI, Preobrazhenskaia LA, Merzhanova GKh.

Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 2010 Jul-Aug;60(4):438-45. Russian.

PMID:
20873133
19.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk