Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 109

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23184064)

1.

Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs. 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fractures--a retrospective study.

Kumar I, Singh V, Singh A, Arora V, Bajaj A.

Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;17(4):287-91. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0377-y. Epub 2012 Nov 25.

PMID:
23184064
4.

Single- vs double-layer and locking vs nonlocking closure of uterus: missing woods for the trees?

Sholapurkar SL.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):829. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 9. No abstract available.

PMID:
25582100
5.

A meta-analysis comparing the 2.0-mm locking plate system with the 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system in treatment of mandible fractures.

Zhan S, Jiang Y, Cheng Z, Ye J.

J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Nov;25(6):2094-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001018.

PMID:
25304139
6.

Comparison of nonlocking plates and locking plates for intraarticular calcaneal fracture.

Chen K, Zhang H, Wang G, Cheng Y, Qian Z, Yang H.

Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Dec;35(12):1298-302. doi: 10.1177/1071100714547520. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

PMID:
25125513
7.

Locking versus non-locking plate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures: a meta-analysis.

Chrcanovic BR.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;43(10):1243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Aug 10.

PMID:
25115355
8.

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3D and Standard Miniplates in Treatment of Mandibular Symphysis and Parasymphysis Fractures.

Agarwal M, Meena B, Gupta DK, Tiwari AD, Jakhar SK.

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014 Jun;13(2):79-83. doi: 10.1007/s12663-013-0483-x. Epub 2013 Feb 15.

9.

Fractographic analysis of 2.0-mm plates with a screw locking system in simulated fractures of the mandibular body.

de Medeiros RC, Lauria de Moura A, Rodrigues DC, Menezes Mendes MB, Sawazaki R, Fernandes Moreira RW.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jun;72(6):1130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 18.

PMID:
24656954
10.

Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible.

Hakim SG, Wolf M, Wendlandt R, Kimmerle H, Sieg P, Jacobsen HC.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;52(4):317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.02.002.

PMID:
24629455
11.

Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial.

Couzens GB, Peters SE, Cutbush K, Hope B, Taylor F, James CD, Rankin CR, Ross M.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 11;15:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-74.

12.

Comparison of compressive strength between three different plates for mandibular angle fractures fixation.

Negreiros Lyrio MC, Monnazzi MS, De Moraes M, Hochuli-Vieira E, Nunes Reis JM, Pereira-Filho VA.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;42(5):e277-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

PMID:
24296119
13.

Locking versus non-locking neutralization plates for treatment of lateral malleolar fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Tsukada S, Otsuji M, Shiozaki A, Yamamoto A, Komatsu S, Yoshimura H, Ikeda H, Hoshino A.

Int Orthop. 2013 Dec;37(12):2451-6.

14.

Treatment outcomes with the use of maxillomandibular fixation screws in the management of mandible fractures.

West GH, Griggs JA, Chandran R, Precheur HV, Buchanan W, Caloss R.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

PMID:
24075236
15.

Experimental biomechanical study of the primary stability of different osteosynthesis systems for mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest graft.

Grohmann I, Raith S, Kesting M, Rau A, Mücke T, Lethaus B, Hölzle F, Steiner T.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;51(8):942-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

PMID:
23958348
16.

Efficacy of locking plates/screw system in mandibular fracture surgery.

Nayak SS, Pushpalatha C, Tammanavar PS, Naduwinmani SL, Mohan M.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Mar 1;14(2):222-6.

PMID:
23811649
17.

Repairing angle of the mandible fractures with a strut plate.

Guy WM, Mohyuddin N, Burchhardt D, Olson KL, Eicher SA, Brissett AE.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jun;139(6):592-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3246.

PMID:
23787417
18.

Complex distal humerus fractures-comparison of polyaxial locking and nonlocking screw configurations-a preliminary biomechanical study.

Hungerer S, Wipf F, von Oldenburg G, Augat P, Penzkofer R.

J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Mar;28(3):130-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829d19a4.

PMID:
23736772
19.

Evaluation of fracture healing and subimplant bone response following fixation with a locking miniplate and screw system for mandibular angle fractures in a sheep model.

Poon CC, Verco S.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jun;42(6):736-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

PMID:
23374732
20.

Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.

Vajgel A, Camargo IB, Willmersdorf RB, de Melo TM, Laureano Filho JR, Vasconcellos RJ.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb;71(2):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.09.019.

PMID:
23351762
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk