Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 150

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23179520)

1.

The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer.

Kuang F, Ren J, Zhong Q, Liyuan F, Huan Y, Chen Z.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Apr;23(4):1050-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2681-1. Epub 2012 Nov 18.

PMID:
23179520
2.

Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images.

Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA, Giles SL, Attygalle AD, Ind TE, Barton DP, Shepherd JH, deSouza NM.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb;200(2):314-20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9545.

PMID:
23345352
3.

Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.

Liu X, Zhou L, Peng W, Wang C, Wang H.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Oct;31(8):1318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

PMID:
23791546
4.

Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness.

Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M, Beets GL, Caseiro-Alves F, Beets-Tan RG.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jun;35(6):1365-71. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23589. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

PMID:
22271382
5.

The value of diffusion-weighted MRI to evaluate the response to radiochemotherapy for cervical cancer.

Kuang F, Yan Z, Wang J, Rao Z.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 May;32(4):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

PMID:
24512795
6.

Lung carcinoma: diffusion-weighted mr imaging--preliminary evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient.

Matoba M, Tonami H, Kondou T, Yokota H, Higashi K, Toga H, Sakuma T.

Radiology. 2007 May;243(2):570-7. Epub 2007 Mar 30.

PMID:
17400757
7.

Reproducibility of measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients of malignant hepatic tumors: effect of DWI techniques and calculation methods.

Kim SY, Lee SS, Park B, Kim N, Kim JK, Park SH, Byun JH, Song KJ, Koo JH, Choi EK, Lee MG.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;36(5):1131-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23744. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

PMID:
22777895
8.

Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.

Doskaliyev A, Yamasaki F, Ohtaki M, Kajiwara Y, Takeshima Y, Watanabe Y, Takayasu T, Amatya VJ, Akiyama Y, Sugiyama K, Kurisu K.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

PMID:
21129872
9.

Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness.

Cao K, Gao M, Sun YS, Li YL, Sun Y, Gao YN, Zhang XP.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):1926-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.019. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21592709
10.

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of standard and high B-value diffusion MR imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a correlation study with histological grade.

Ahn SJ, Choi SH, Kim YJ, Kim KG, Sohn CH, Han MH, Chang KH, Min HS.

Acad Radiol. 2012 Oct;19(10):1233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

PMID:
22818788
11.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer.

Liu Y, Bai R, Sun H, Liu H, Wang D.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Nov-Dec;33(6):858-62. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31819e93af.

PMID:
19940650
12.

Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained using high b-value when diagnosing prostate cancer using 3 tesla MRI: comparison between ultra-high b-value (2000 s/mm²) and standard high b-value (1000 s/mm²).

Kitajima K, Takahashi S, Ueno Y, Yoshikawa T, Ohno Y, Obara M, Miyake H, Fujisawa M, Sugimura K.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):198-205. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23627. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

PMID:
22371381
13.

Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience.

Kim JK, Kim KA, Park BW, Kim N, Cho KS.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;28(3):714-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21480. Erratum in: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 May;29(5):1242.

PMID:
18777531
14.

Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.

Pereira FP, Martins G, Figueiredo E, Domingues MN, Domingues RC, da Fonseca LM, Gasparetto EL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1030-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2522. Erratum in: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):477.

PMID:
19770326
15.

Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer.

Payne GS, Schmidt M, Morgan VA, Giles S, Bridges J, Ind T, DeSouza NM.

Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Feb;116(2):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.044. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

PMID:
19875159
16.

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.

Inoue C, Fujii S, Kaneda S, Fukunaga T, Kaminou T, Kigawa J, Harada T, Ogawa T.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jul;40(1):157-61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24372. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

PMID:
24677497
17.

Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in malignant breast lesions using different b value combinations.

Nilsen LB, Fangberget A, Geier O, Seierstad T.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Apr;23(4):1027-33. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2687-8. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

18.

[Diffusion weighted imaging features of normal uterine cervix and cervical carcinoma].

Zhang Y, Liang BL, Gao L, Ye RX, Shen J, Zhong JL.

Ai Zheng. 2007 May;26(5):508-12. Chinese.

PMID:
17672942
19.

High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring breast cancer treatment response.

Wilmes LJ, McLaughlin RL, Newitt DC, Singer L, Sinha SP, Proctor E, Wisner DJ, Saritas EU, Kornak J, Shankaranarayanan A, Banerjee S, Jones EF, Joe BN, Hylton NM.

Acad Radiol. 2013 May;20(5):581-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.01.009.

PMID:
23570936
20.

Evaluation of ADC measurements among solid pancreatic masses by respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging with inversion-recovery fat-suppression technique at 3.0T.

Yao XZ, Yun H, Zeng MS, Wang H, Sun F, Rao SX, Ji Y.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May;31(4):524-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

PMID:
23200681
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk